IP: Lanham Act Clarifications
March 1, 2011
In addition to clarifying that proof of actual confusion is not required to recover money damages in a trademark case, the 8th Circuit's decision in Masters has several other practical implications.
Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.