No-Poachers Find Themselves in Hot Water

A "no-poach" agreement unlawfully harms employees, labor markets, and ultimately even consumers.

August 29, 2018

“Don’t come after my employees, and I won’t come after yours.” Perhaps this arrangement seems fair to the untrained antitrust eye. Businesses might in fact justify such an agreement as necessary to maintain a sense of staff stability and firm culture. Make no mistake, however, a “no-poach” agreement, as these arrangements are now called, unlawfully harms employees, labor markets, and ultimately even consumers. Employers who enter into them could also find themselves facing a government investigation criminal prosecution (read: fine + jail time), and private civil litigation.

Bloomberg Law

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.


Kellie Lerner


Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group;
Pronouns: she/her

Related Publications

March 14, 2024
How Many Cases Have You Tried to a Verdict?
Gabriel Berg, Lauren Coppola - New York Law Journal
January 3, 2024
Navigating Class Actions After Papa John's Settlement Denial
Law360 - William Reiss, Ellen Jalkut, Laura Song
Fall 2023
All Is Not Lost: Personal Jurisdiction in a Post-BMS World
Meegan Hollywood, Jonathan Edelman - Antitrust Magazine
August 21, 2023
Colorado Expands Antitrust Protection
William Reiss and Ellen Jalkut - Colorado State Antitrust Act of 2023
August 7, 2023
Back to Top