- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
July 10, 2020Silicon Valley Attorneys Listed as “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars”
-
July 9, 2020Four Robins Kaplan Firm Members Recognized by Minnesota Lawyer
-
July 9, 2020Robins Kaplan Signs Mansfield Rule to Boost Diversity in Leadership
-
July 21, 2020Discovering a Hidden Revenue Stream: Recoveries from Antitrust Class Action Settlements in Economic Downturn
-
August 18, 2020Discovering a Hidden Revenue Stream: Recoveries from Antitrust Class Action Settlements in Economic Downturn
-
September 10, 2020Volunteer Lawyers Network Riverfront Celebration 2020
-
Summer 2020The Brave New World of Virtual Notarization
-
Summer 2020What Could be the Harm? Minnesota's Harmless Error Statute
-
Summer 2020What's a Fiduciary To Do? Considerations for Periods of Uncertainty
Experience
Meegan Hollywood prosecutes actions involving price-fixing, unlawful monopolization and other anticompetitive practices. She previously litigated the in In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, involving a class of direct purchasers who recovered over $1.2 billion in settlements for an alleged global conspiracy in the market for airfreight services. She is currently litigating In re Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation, which alleges that the defendants, whom collectively own more than 500 local stations, engaged in a scheme to artificially inflate the price of advertisements in violation of federal antitrust law. Additionally, she currently represents a direct action plaintiff in opt-out litigation against two of the largest freight railroads in the country for allegedly conspiring to fix prices on rail shipments. She has also defended clients in complex commercial litigation and in white collar and securities fraud investigations.
Ms. Hollywood is the pro bono chair for the New York Office. She is currently working with KIND (Kids in Need of Defense) to provide pro bono assistance to unaccompanied refugee children seeking Special Immigrant Juvenile Status in the United States.
In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation: Over $1.2 billion in settlements for an alleged global conspiracy to fix surcharges for air cargo shipping services. Defendants in the decade-long litigation included many of the world’s largest airlines.
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation: Over $433 million in settlements regarding an alleged conspiracy to unlawfully fix the prices of polyurethane foam in the United States.
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.: Representing plaintiffs in connection with its antitrust claims against defendants, Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company for allegedly conspiring to increase revenue by imposing non-negotiable fuel surcharges on rail shipments.
- Named to Law360's Competition Editorial Advisory Board (2020)
- Named an “On the Rise: Top 40 Young Lawyer” by the American Bar Association (2018)
- Named a “Woman Worth Watching,” Profiles in Diversity Journal (2018)
- Finalist for "Lawyer of the Year Under 40," Global Competition Review (2018)
- Named a "New York Metro Super Lawyer," Super Lawyers (2019)
- Named a "New York Metro Rising Star," Super Lawyers (2015-2018)
- Named a "Rising Star," New York Law Journal (2015)
- Named a "Woman in Investigations," Global Investigations Review (2015)
- Finalist, "2014 Antitrust Enforcement Award / Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement by a Young Lawyer," American Antitrust Institute (2014)
- New York
- U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- Villanova Law School, J.D., cum laude (2007); Managing Editor of Research and Writing, Villanova Law Review
- State University of New York at Binghamton, B.A. in Political Science, cum laude (2004)
- American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, Global Private Litigation Committee, Vice Chair
- New York State Bar Association Antitrust Law Section
- Law360, "Law360's 2020 Competition Editorial Advisory Board Members," (May 27, 2020)
- Law360, “Attorneys Want $100M In Air Cargo Antitrust Case,” (August 19, 2016)
- Business Insider, “Why The Justice Department Won't Go After Amazon Even Though Paul Krugman Thinks It's Hurting America” (October 20, 2014);
- Global Competition Review, “Air Cargo Plaintiffs on the Verge of Class Certification” (October 16, 2014).
- Franchising Agreements and the No-Poach Approach
American Bar Association, Antitrust Law Section, New York, New York (March 13, 2020) - New Frontiers in Antitrust
American Bar Association, Section of Litigation & Solo, Small Firm and General Practice Division CLE Conference, New York, New York (May 1, 2019) - Why Antitrust
American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, New York, New York (February 25, 2019) - Becoming an Antitrust Lawyer
New York State Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, New York, New York (March 10, 2016) - Antitrust and Competition
New York State Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section, New York, New York (January 30, 2015)
RESOURCES
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.