Amazon The 1st Illegal Monopsony
How Amazon’s shipping delays after bad negotiations with e-book publisher could be monopsony unlawful price lowering by a powerful buyer.
September 02, 2014
It’s been nearly four months since the New York Times first published reports of deteriorating contract negotiations between Amazon.com Inc. and Hachette Book Group.  While some details have begun to trickle in from the online retailer and book publisher, not much has been divulged with respect to the exact nature of the dispute. The general consensus is that Hachette prefers to return to an agency pricing model, which allows publishers to set the prices of their own books. Amazon is adamantly opposed to this switch because the agency model prevents the kind of drastic discounting that Amazon is known for. All of this has ignited commentary among authors, publishers and observers alike. It’s no secret that publishers deem Amazon’s discounting practices and bullying tactics a violation of antitrust laws. Recent debate, however, has focused on whether U.S. regulators tend to agree.
All Content © 2003‐2014, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.