- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Hollywood Studio Fire Cased Settled
November 6, 2007
The case involved a building fire at a motion picture studio in Hollywood, California. The firm's client, Affiliated FM Insurance Company, insured the master tenant and the owner of the building, and paid the master tenant for its business interruption losses as well as the building owner's cost to repair the building. Affiliated then assigned the recovery action to the Los Angeles office. Both of Affiliated's insureds, as well as six additional subtenants and insurers also pursued the recovery action for additional damages.
Affiliated contended that an LADWP transformer adjacent to the building faulted internally, which superheated cooling oil inside the transformer. The fault eventually caused the transformer to explode and eject the oil like a flamethrower on the adjacent studio. The hot oil landed on a skylight, which melted, and the burning oil started the fire inside the building. The LADWP contended that there was a preexisting electrical fire, which eventually caused the transformer to fault and explode.
At trial, Robins, Kaplan, Miller, & Ciresi L.L.P. attorneys William Webster and James Koelzer presented eyewitness accounts of the events, and extensive technical evidence about the inner workings of the transformer, the damage to the transformer and the failure analysis, as well as the sequence of events leading to the catastrophic fire. Ultimately they proved that the transformer explosion must have preceded the fire inside the building.
Just days before the sequel was set for production in Los Angeles Superior Court with the damages phase, the LADWP agreed to pay Affiliated $5,800,000.
Related Professionals
David E. Bocan
Partner
William A. Webster
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.