The 9th Circ.'s Rule 6(e) Test For Private Antitrust Cases

October 20, 2015

Law360, NEW YORK, October 9, 2015—In In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation ("ODD"),[1] the Ninth Circuit recently clarified when materials created as part of a criminal government investigation should be barred from disclosure in civil litigation under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). While over half of the federal circuits that have analyzed the issue coalesced behind the fact-intensive "effect test" (described herein), the Ninth Circuit decisively announced in ODD that it would not endorse that test. Instead, the Ninth Circuit created a new, ostensibly straightforward, approach to determine whether materials are protected under Rule 6(e).

All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.


Kellie Lerner


Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group;
Pronouns: she/her

Michelle Zolnoski

Related Publications

March 14, 2024
How Many Cases Have You Tried to a Verdict?
Gabriel Berg, Lauren Coppola - New York Law Journal
January 3, 2024
Navigating Class Actions After Papa John's Settlement Denial
Law360 - William Reiss, Ellen Jalkut, Laura Song
Fall 2023
All Is Not Lost: Personal Jurisdiction in a Post-BMS World
Meegan Hollywood, Jonathan Edelman - Antitrust Magazine
August 21, 2023
Colorado Expands Antitrust Protection
William Reiss and Ellen Jalkut - Colorado State Antitrust Act of 2023
August 7, 2023
Back to Top