- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP™
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLPTM
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
August 3, 2021Robins Kaplan Civil Rights Practice Group Named Elite Trial Lawyers
-
August 2, 2021Jake Holdreith Shortlisted by LMG Life Sciences for Hatch-Waxman Litigator of the Year
-
July 27, 2021Robins Kaplan Secures $19.5M Settlement for Indirect Buyers in Interior Molded Doors Antitrust Litigation
-
August 6, 2021Mastering the Deposition: 30(b)(6) Deposition Strategies and Updates 2021
-
August 19, 2021Annual Robins Kaplan MAJ Reception
-
August 24, 2021Domesticating an Out of State Judgment in The State of Florida
-
Second QuarterANDA Litigation Settlements
-
Second QuarterNew ANDA Cases
-
Second QuarterANDA Approvals
-
August 4, 2021Financial Daily Dose 8.4.2021 | Top Story: SEC Chief Announces Agency’s Crypto Crackdown
-
August 3, 2021Financial Daily Dose 8.3.2021 | Top Story: NLRB Officer Urges Board to Order Amazon Union Re-Vote
-
July 28, 2021Financial Daily Dose 7.28.2021 | Top Story: Big Tech Reports Massive Q2 Results
Judge Keeps Intact Much of Auto Parts Antitrust MDL
June 6, 2013
All Content © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Law360, New York (June 06, 2013, 7:49 PM ET) ‐‐ A Michigan federal judge on Thursday trimmed some indirect purchaser claims from multidistrict litigation accusing auto parts makers of bid‐rigging and price‐fixing on automotive wire harnesses, but refused to toss federal antitrust claims lodged by a group of direct purchasers of the products.
U.S. District Judge Marianne Batani partially granted and partially denied a motion to dismiss allegations lodged by two putative classes of indirect wire‐harness purchasers — one comprising auto dealers, another comprising consumers — throwing out certain state law claims against several auto parts companies, including Yazaki Corp., Denso Corp. and Nippon Seiki Co. Ltd.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.