- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
May 10, 2021Robins Kaplan Appointed Interim Lead Counsel in Antitrust Class Action Against Martin Shkreli and His Former Companies
-
May 7, 2021Robins Kaplan Attorneys Nominated for Antitrust Writing Awards 2021
-
April 26, 2021Amy Churan Named to L.A. Business Journal’s “Women of Influence” List
-
May 5, 12, and 19, 2021Second Annual AI Legal Summit
-
May 17, 2021Practice Pointers for Virtual Hearings
-
May 19, 2021Minnesota IP Law Association (MIPLA) Virtual Stampede
-
May 5, 2021Bio-Rad Ruling Highlights IP Assignment Clause Limits
-
May 3, 2021Maintain A Foothold
-
April 20, 2021Copyright Concerns For NFT Buyers, Sellers In Music Industry
-
May 11, 2021Financial Daily Dose 5.11.2021 | Top Story: FBI Identifies Hackers Behind Pipeline Attack
-
May 10, 2021Financial Daily Dose 5.10.2021 | Top Story: Ransomware Attack Prompts Closure of Key U.S. Pipeline
-
May 7, 2021Financial Daily Dose 5.7.2021 | Top Story: Improving Unemployment Figures Buoys Hopes for Strong April Jobs Report
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Judge Keeps Intact Much of Auto Parts Antitrust MDL
June 6, 2013
All Content © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Law360, New York (June 06, 2013, 7:49 PM ET) ‐‐ A Michigan federal judge on Thursday trimmed some indirect purchaser claims from multidistrict litigation accusing auto parts makers of bid‐rigging and price‐fixing on automotive wire harnesses, but refused to toss federal antitrust claims lodged by a group of direct purchasers of the products.
U.S. District Judge Marianne Batani partially granted and partially denied a motion to dismiss allegations lodged by two putative classes of indirect wire‐harness purchasers — one comprising auto dealers, another comprising consumers — throwing out certain state law claims against several auto parts companies, including Yazaki Corp., Denso Corp. and Nippon Seiki Co. Ltd.
Law360
Related Publications
May 5, 2021
Bio-Rad Ruling Highlights IP Assignment Clause Limits
Bryan J. Vogel, Derrick J. Carman - Law360
May 3, 2021
Maintain A Foothold
Rayna E. Kessler - AAJ Trial Magazine
April 20, 2021
Copyright Concerns For NFT Buyers, Sellers In Music Industry
Carly Kessler - Law360
First Quarter
ANDA Approvals
GENERICally Speaking Spring 2021
First Quarter
ANDA Litigation Settlements
GENERICally Speaking Spring 2021
Related News
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.