- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 6, 2022Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2022 Partners
-
December 6, 2021Robins Kaplan Joins Wanton Injustice Legal Detail as a Founder
-
November 22, 2021Patent Trial and Appeal Board Finds Transitional Patent Eligible for PGR, Invalidates Claims, and Rejects Novel Argument That Bankruptcy Stay Ran out the PTAB Clock
-
December 10, 2021LGBTQ Legal Services: Transgender Name Change Clinic
-
December 16, 2021SMRLS Social Justice Uncorked
-
Winter 2021Avoiding Guilt by Association
-
Winter 2021Can You Keep a Secret? And Should You?
-
Winter 2021Quiet Trusts: The Benefits of Privacy in Estate Planning
-
December 8, 2021Embattled OCC Nominee Omarova Withdraws From Consideration
-
December 7, 2021Samsung Shakes Up Leadership, Consolidates Business Units
-
December 6, 2021Cryptos Crash As Mixed Jobs Report Pushes Investors to Safety
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Judge Keeps Intact Much of Auto Parts Antitrust MDL
June 6, 2013
All Content © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Law360, New York (June 06, 2013, 7:49 PM ET) ‐‐ A Michigan federal judge on Thursday trimmed some indirect purchaser claims from multidistrict litigation accusing auto parts makers of bid‐rigging and price‐fixing on automotive wire harnesses, but refused to toss federal antitrust claims lodged by a group of direct purchasers of the products.
U.S. District Judge Marianne Batani partially granted and partially denied a motion to dismiss allegations lodged by two putative classes of indirect wire‐harness purchasers — one comprising auto dealers, another comprising consumers — throwing out certain state law claims against several auto parts companies, including Yazaki Corp., Denso Corp. and Nippon Seiki Co. Ltd.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.