- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
April 16, 2021Ronald Schutz Named 2021 Lawdragon Legend
-
April 14, 2021Robins Kaplan Secures Asylum, Relative Petition for Somali Journalist
-
April 12, 2021Robins Kaplan Executives Recognized by Twin Cities Business
-
April 28, 2021Creating the Audit Clause for Today’s Compliance Review
-
April 29, 2021International Intellectual Property: Challenges of Cross-Border Litigation
-
April 29, 2021Breakthrough Greater Boston Reflections on Resilience Virtual Gala
-
April 13, 2021US Antitrust Regulators Should Foster Climate Collaboration
-
April 2, 2021Prepare For Minn. Privacy Law To Catch Up To Calif., Wash.
-
Spring 2021Fiduciary or Foe? Revisiting Meinhard v. Salmon
-
April 16, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.16.2021 | Top Story: Lower Jobless Claims and Big U.S. Retail Sales Power Dow Above 34,000
-
April 15, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.15.2021 | Top Story: Big Banks Deliver Huge Q1 Profits, Economic Optimism Despite Ongoing Challenges
-
April 14, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.14.2021 | Top Story: Crypto Exchange Coinbase Makes Public Debut on Nasdaq
Iam Patent 1000 Recommends Robins Kaplan for Patent Litigation for Tenth Consecutive Year
June 15, 2020
Robins Kaplan LLP has been recognized by IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals 2020 as a nationally recommended plaintiff’s firm and a recommended litigation firm in Minnesota and New York. The guide also recognized the following eight Robins Kaplan partners:
- Patrick Arenz: Recommended for Litigation in Minnesota
- Elizabeth Gardner: Recommended for Litigation in New York
- Jake Holdreith: Recommended for Litigation in Minnesota
- Christopher Larus: Recommended for Litigation and Transactions in Minnesota
- Cyrus Morton: Recommended for Post-Grant Proceedings Nationwide, Recommended for Litigation in Minnesota
- Ronald Schutz: Recommended for Litigation in Minnesota and New York
- Christopher Seidl: Recommended for Litigation in Minnesota
- Bryan Vogel: Recommended for Litigation in New York
In describing the firm and its practitioners, IAM noted:
Potent contentious force Robins Kaplan has what it takes to emerge victorious from courtroom battles and its many savvy trial lawyers do so time and again in commercially consequential patent disputes... Exceptional leadership is provided by many, including executive board chair Ronald J. Schutz, health and life sciences captain Jake M. Holdreith, post-grant chair Cyrus A. Morton, IP and technology litigation group head Christopher K. Larus, and global business and technology sourcing disputes helmsman Christopher A. Seidl; all are seasoned trial vets with abundant narrative gifts and compelling powers of persuasion. Special praise this year goes to Holdreith, a “personable, pragmatic, efficient and reliable lawyer who does a wonderful job distilling down complex issues and giving straightforward advice,” while remaining “even-keeled in heated, antagonistic court settings.” Larus and Patrick M. Arenz are also commended: Larus as a senior lead counsel who not only “knows how to tell a good story,” but “stays on top of all aspects of his cases;” and Arenz as an “excellent, thorough, and focused cross-examiner.” Not satisfied with standard setting in the litigation field in Minnesota, Robins Kaplan also acquits itself with distinction in licensing and IP monetization – subjects that Larus knows a great deal about.
IAM Patent 1000 identifies top patent professionals in key jurisdictions around the globe, shining a spotlight on the firms and individuals that are deemed outstanding in this area of practice. The selection process involves a detailed analysis of submissions from a worldwide pool of law firms, as well as more than 1,700 interviews with patent specialists.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.