- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
October 10, 2024Michael Collyard and Ronald Schutz Named to Minnesota Lawyer’s Power 30: Business Litigation List
-
October 9, 2024Michael Geibelson Named to Daily Journal’s Top Trade Secrets Lawyers
-
October 8, 2024Robins Kaplan Partners Named Women Worth Watching in Leadership
-
October 20, 2024License Agreement Disputes:
-
October 21, 2024How Much Did We Invest in AI?
-
October 22, 2024Justice for All: Minnesota's Civil Legal Aid and Pro Bono Landscape
-
September 2024Meet Our New Partner and Trial Advocacy Seminar Keynote Speaker: B. Todd Jones
-
September 2024Q&A with Alan Harter, Founder of Pactolus Private Wealth Management
-
August 2024Recruiting & Retaining Diverse Attorneys: Building an Inclusive Legal Profession
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Claims Handling Practices - Georgia
September 3, 2019
Claims Adjusting Standards
Georgia has enacted an “Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.” O.C.G.A. § 33-6-30, et seq. An insurer violates the Act if it commits the acts listed below “flagrantly and in conscious disregard of [the Act]” or “with such frequency so as to indicate a general business practice to engage in such conduct.” O.C.G.A. § 33-6-33.
The prohibited practices are as follows (O.C.G.A § 33-6-34):
- Knowingly misrepresenting to claimants and insureds relevant facts or policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
- Failing to acknowledge with reasonable promptness pertinent communications with respect to claims arising under its policies.
- Failing to adopt and implement procedures for the prompt investigation and settlement of claims arising under its policies.
- Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlement of claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear.
- Compelling insureds or beneficiaries to institute suits to recover amounts due under its policies by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits brought by them.
- Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation.
- When requested by the insured in writing, failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after having completed its investigation related to such claim or claims.
- When requested by the insured in writing, making claims payments to an insured or beneficiary without indicating the coverage under which each payment is being made.
- Unreasonably delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring both a formal proof of loss and subsequent verification that would result in duplication of information and verification appearing in the formal proof of loss form; provided, however, this paragraph shall not preclude an insurer from obtaining sworn statements if permitted under the policy.
- When requested by the insured in writing, failing in the case of claims denial or offers of compromise settlement to provide promptly a reasonable and accurate explanation of the basis for such actions. In the case of claims denials, such denials shall be in writing.
- Failing to provide forms necessary to file claims within 15 calendar days of a request with reasonable explanations regarding their use.
- Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards to assure that the repairs of a repairer owned by the insurer are performed in a workmanlike manner.
- Indicating to a first-party claimant on a payment, draft check, or accompanying letter that said payment is final or a release of any claim unless the policy limit has been paid or there has been a compromise settlement agreed to by the first-party claimant and the insurer as to coverage and amount payable under the contract.
- Issuing checks or drafts in partial settlement of a loss or claim under a specific coverage which contain language which releases the insurer or its insured from its total liability.
But note that an insured does not have a private right of action under the Act. This is a matter reserved for the Insurance Commissioner. O.C.G.A. § 33-6-37; Javits v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119085 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 26, 2014); Rodgers v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 228 Ga. App. 499 (1997).
Hurricane Claims Standards
The Georgia Department of Insurance issues press releases regarding named-storms on the Commission’s website: https://www.oci.ga.gov/
Duty of Good Faith
The Georgia bad faith statute is O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6. To prevail, an insured must prove that: (1) the claim is covered under the policy; (2) the insurer refused to pay within 60 days of a demand for payment prior to suit; and (3) the insurer’s failure to pay was motivated by bad faith. If the insured prevails, in addition to the loss it can recover up to 50% of the claim and attorney’s fees.
The statute is the exclusive remedy for an insurer’s bad faith refusal to pay insurance proceeds. Great Southwest Exp. Co., Inc. v. Great American Ins. Co. of New York, 292 Ga.App. 757, 760 (2008).
The test is reasonableness. “Where the . . . insurer has reasonable grounds to contest the claim, no penalty should be permitted.” Lavoi Corp., Inc. v. National Fire Ins. of Hartford, 293 Ga.App. 142, 153 (2008); Mock v. Cent. Mut. Ins. Co., 158 F. Supp. 3d 1332, 1350 (S.D. Ga. 2016).
Bad faith is “any frivolous and unfounded refusal in law or in fact to pay according to the terms of the policy.” King v. Atlanta Cas. Ins. Co., 279 Ga.App. 554, 556 (2006).
Penalties for bad faith are not available where no coverage exists as a matter of law. Anderson v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 255 Ga.App. 734, 737 (2002).
Independent and Public Adjusters
Independent and public adjusters are governed by O.C.G.A. § 33-23-43 (2014).
Communication, Investigation, and Payment Deadlines
Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 120-2-52-.03 (2017).
Acknowledge receipt of notification of first-party claim within 15 days.
Provide first-party claimant proof of loss forms with reasonable explanations regarding their use within 15 days from receipt of notification of claim.
Affirm or deny liability on all first-party property damage claims if completed proof of loss is required within 15 days of receiving completed proof of loss.
Affirm or deny liability on all first-party property damage claims if completed proof of loss is not required within 30 days from the day the claim was reported.
Notify claimant within 5 business days after receiving the competed proof of loss that more time is needed to determine whether a first-party property damage claim should be accepted or denied stating the reasons that more time is needed and an estimate of additional time needed to establish liability. The total time to accept or deny liability shall not exceed 60 days.
Tender payment on first-party property damage claim within 10 days after coverage is confirmed and full amount of claim is determined and undisputed.
Tender payment within 10 days where multiple coverages are involved and payments for individual coverages are undisputed and where payee is known, if payment would terminate insurer’s known liability under that individual coverage.
If appropriate, submit written request for arbitration to Commissioner of Insurance upon affirmation of liability on a claim or for individual coverages where the claim involves multiple coverages and the amount payable is disputed.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Matthew P. Cardosi
Associate
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.