- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
A. James Anderson
A. James Anderson
Of Counsel
Experience
- Practice focuses in the areas of intellectual property litigation, commercial property, and business interruption insurance for subrogation and coverage analysis/litigation, and general commercial disputes.
Has concentrated on patent infringement litigation since approximately 1990. Illustrative cases include:
- Representation of an inventor against a Japanese bicycle components manufacturer, a case which required six (6) weeks of depositions in Japan.
- Leading the firm’s handling of a biotech plaintiff’s infringement case involving a pediatric vaccine.
- Defense of a manufacturer of combination exit sign/emergency lighting fixtures.
- Representation of the patent owner- medical device manufacturer in a case tried in September 2002.
- Representation of the patent owner in a computer design/architecture case tried against a major PC manufacturer in June 2003.
- Intergraph v. Dell, Hewlett Packard and Gateway: Represented Intergraph Corp. in patent litigation involving microprocessor system design in a case venued in East Texas. Recovered a total of $500 million in settlements as follows:
- Hewlett-Packard $141 million, with cross licenses
- Dell/Intel $225 million
- Gateway/emachines $12 million plus ongoing royalties
- AMD $20 million
- IBM $10 million plus a license to IBM's portfolio
- Toshiba and NEC, confidential settlements
Licensing campaign following litigation:
- Fujitsu $9.75 million
- Sony $15 million
- Acer $7.5 million
- Other confidential licenses
- Listed in The Best Lawyers in America (2013-2025 editions)
- Named a "Georgia Super Lawyer," Super Lawyers (2004-2005, 2007)
Bar Admissions
- Georgia
- Minnesota (Inactive/Non-Resident)
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court, Georgia
- U.S. District Court, Minnesota
Education
Rutgers School of Law (1971), served on the Rutgers Law Review for two years and served as Notes and Comments Editor senior year
Rutgers University, B.A. in English as a Henry Rutgers scholar
Professional Associations
- American Bar Association
- Georgia Bar Association
- Minnesota Bar Association
- Handling the Child Trauma Case
Georgia Public Defenders Association, Savannah, Georgia (July 27, 2016) - Cross Examining the Forensic Expert
Georgia Public Defenders Association, Savannah, Georgia (July 27, 2016) - USPTO Inter Partes Patent Proceedings Committee
American Intellectual Property Law Association, New York, New York (May 7, 2010) - Expert Direct/Cross Demonstration
Practising Law Institute, Atlanta, Georgia (November 9, 2009) - Evaluating and Executing IP Litigation Strategies
GSU Corporate IP Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (November 3, 2009) - Claims Construction as a Component of the Overall Litigation Strategies from Plaintiff and Defendant Perspectives/Defendant Perspective
Law Seminars International, College Park, Georgia (April 24, 2009) - Demonstration of a Closing Argument: Tips from a Patent Trial Lawyer and a Jury Consultant
Practising Law Institute, Atlanta, Georgia (July 11, 2008) - Patent Claim Construction Workshop
Law Seminars, Atlanta, Georgia (April 25, 2008) - Claim Construction Litigation Strategies from Plaintiff and Defendant Perspectives
Law Seminars International, Four Seasons Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia (April 25, 2008) - Discovery Issues in Patent Litigation (Panel Chair)
Practising Law Institute, Atlanta, Georgia (November 5, 2007) - Litigating Against the Foreign National
Trial Lawyers Approach to Winning Patent Cases Seminar (January 1, 1998)
RESOURCES
Links to full publications and news releases.
PUBLICATIONS
April 2010
Strategic Uses of Inter Partes Reexamination Concurrent with District Court Litigation
American Intellectual Property Law Association
April 2008
Strategies for Navigating Claim Construction
Claim Construction Litigation Series
November 2007
Discovery Issues in Patent Litigation
Practising Law Institute
NEWS
August 15, 2024
August 17, 2023
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.