- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
- Litigation Support Services
-
January 17, 2020Patrick Arenz Named to America's Top 100 List for High-Stakes Litigation
-
January 08, 2020Bremer Bank Employee-Shareholders File Class Action Lawsuit Against Three Trustees of Otto Bremer Trust
-
January 08, 2020Robins Kaplan Adds Leading Civil Rights, Personal Injury Attorneys to Minneapolis Office
-
January 20, 2020The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers 2020 Awards Ceremony
-
January 24, 2020Elimination of Bias: Seeing Juveniles with Justice
-
January 28, 2020Boston 1L Diversity Summer Associate Program Reception
-
January 10, 2020Top Tips for Trying Your First (or Next) Patent Jury Trial
-
January 2020A Victory for All Involved
-
January 2020Facing the Music: Protecting Photography in the Age of Instagram
Construction Litigation
Construction transactions and litigation have specific issues that require an attorney who knows the business. At Robins Kaplan LLP, our construction litigation lawyers provide both transactional and litigation services that encompass nearly every aspect of the construction industry. With a variety of complex construction litigation experience on both public and private projects, we have assisted clients in first-party contracts (coverage disputes on construction-related issues), prosecuting and defending third-party affirmative claims, the evaluation and resolution of construction contract disputes, and the negotiation and drafting of construction agreements.
For surety clients, our construction litigation attorneys have extensive experience in the evaluation, resolution and litigation of payment and performance bond claims. This includes the handling of small, large and multi-project defaults to achieve a timely completion of open projects while mitigating losses and maximizing recovery efforts. In addition, we have represented these clients on matters arising out of fiduciary bonds, litigation bonds, license and permit bonds, and other miscellaneous bond matters, as well as provided necessary training and counseled clients on state regulations and Department of Insurance requirements.
Selected Case Results*
- Obtained summary judgment in favor of national retailer against developer over dispute arising out of developer’s failure to construct the premises in accordance with lease provisions. (Case now pending on appeal.)
- Represented ski company in significant over-charge dispute with contractor in build out of client’s flagship store.
- Represented and defended retailer and private owner against multiple mechanics' lien claims following default and bankruptcy of general contractor.
- Defended $4 million construction defect claim resulting in settlement for payment of $200,000.
- Represented individual home owner in multi-million construction defect case resulting in recovery of repair costs and attorneys’ fees.
- Represented surety in the successful completion of multiple projects following general contractor’s bankruptcy filing, reducing Surety’s projected losses from $50 million to less than $5 million. Also recovered over $3 million from personal indemnitors.
- Negotiated post-default completion of an $8 million middle school renovation. Reduced projected losses in excess of $3.5 million to less than $1 million. Pursued recovery action against individual defendants resulting in pre-litigation recovery of $700,000.
- Defended $3.5 million claim arising from default on county water treatment plant resulting in a mediated settlement.
- Great West Contractors, Inc. v. WSS Industrial Construction, Inc., Reversed judgment by proving that contractor had no right to pursue recovery based upon failure to comply with the California contractor’s licensing requirements.
* Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation we practice. They do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case, as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.
RELATED PROFESSIONALS
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.