Rotary Systems, Inc. v. TomoTherapy Inc., 2014 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1301 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2014), rev. denied (2015).

Acting as appellate counsel, we obtained the reversal of summary judgment of a claim under the Minnesota Uniform Trade Secrets Act involving a rotary union that was used in radiation-therapy systems. The Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment that the Rotary Systems design was not a trade secret, finding that genuine issues of fact required a trial on whether Rotary Systems made reasonable efforts to preserve the secrecy of its designs. 

Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation we practice. They do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case, as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.
Disclaimer

Similar Results

Achieved Extraordinary $6.25 Billion Settlement in Interchange Fee Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Secured $6.5 Billion Settlement in Historic Big Tobacco Lawsuit
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Trademark, Advertising, and Brand Litigation
$2.7B+ Award in Kraft Foods Global Inc. Mondelez International Inc. v. Starbucks
Domestic and International Arbitration
Secured in Excess of $1.2 Billion in Settlements in Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
Obtained More than $1.2 Billion, the Largest Indirect Purchaser Recovery in U.S. History, in Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
$500 Million in Honeywell v. Minolta
Patent Litigation
$470 Million Settlement in Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster
$565 Million in Eolas Technologies, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California v. Microsoft Corporation
Business Litigation Software Litigation Attorney
$400 Million in Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Patent Litigation
$320 Million in Celador International, Ltd. v. The Walt Disney Company
Business Litigation Entertainment and Media Litigation Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
$128 Million in Fonar v. General Electric
Patent Litigation
$91 Million in Union Oil Company of California (“UNOCAL”) v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
$89 Million in Grantley v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Software Litigation Attorney
Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung
Business Litigation Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation
$10.3 Million Verdict Involving Child Seriously Injured by Semi-Trailer
Personal Injury Attorneys
Back to Top