Rotary Systems, Inc. v. TomoTherapy Inc., 2014 Minn. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1301 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2014), rev. denied (2015).

Acting as appellate counsel, we obtained the reversal of summary judgment of a claim under the Minnesota Uniform Trade Secrets Act involving a rotary union that was used in radiation-therapy systems. The Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment that the Rotary Systems design was not a trade secret, finding that genuine issues of fact required a trial on whether Rotary Systems made reasonable efforts to preserve the secrecy of its designs. 

Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation we practice. They do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case, as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.
Disclaimer

Similar Results

$6.25 Billion Antitrust Settlement in Interchange Fee Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
$6.6 Billion in State of Minnesota and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota v. Philip Morris, et al.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Trademark, Advertising, and Brand Litigation
$2.7B+ Award in Kraft Foods Global Inc. Mondelez International Inc. v. Starbucks
Domestic and International Arbitration
$1.2 Billion in Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
$1.1 Billion in Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation
$500 Million in Honeywell v. Minolta
Patent Litigation
$470 Million Settlement in Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster
$565 Million in Eolas Technologies, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California v. Microsoft Corporation
Business Litigation Software Litigation Attorney
$400 Million in Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
Patent Litigation
Back to Top