- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
May 12, 2022Robins Kaplan Practice Group, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
-
May 9, 2022Six Partners Recognized as “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property
-
May 4, 2022Robins Kaplan LLP Relocates Silicon Valley Office
-
May 24, 2022Intellectual Property and Innovation Summit, USA
-
May 26, 2022Democracy’s Last Line of Defense
-
June 2, 2022Hennepin County Bar Foundation 2022 Bar Benefit
-
May 19, 202211th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
-
May 13, 2022Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-
May 5, 2022Antitrust Law As A Tool Against Privacy Abuses
-
May 20, 2022China Unexpectedly Cuts Key Benchmark Rate in Attempt to Jump-Start Flagging Economy
-
May 19, 2022Inflation-Battered Retailers Spur Vast Market Selloff
-
May 18, 2022Connecticut Becomes Fifth US State to Pass Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Law
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Upsher-Smith Obtains Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of 10 Patents
Represented Upsher-Smith Laboratories in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement case in which Judge Sue Robinson granted summary judgment of non-infringement of 10 patents claiming a transdermal testosterone gel and method of treating hypogonadism. The technology related to claimed macrocyclic penetration enhancers for increasing the rate of passage of an androgen through the skin. We were successful in demonstrating to the court that the case warranted an exception to the court’s ordinary practice of declining to hear summary judgment motions in Hatch-Waxman cases. Auxilium Pharms., Inc. v. Upsher-Smith Labs., Inc., 13-148-SLR (D. Del.).
Similar Results
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.