- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
- Litigation Support Services
-
January 08, 2020Bremer Bank Employee-Shareholders File Class Action Lawsuit Against Three Trustees of Otto Bremer Trust
-
January 08, 2020Robins Kaplan Adds Leading Civil Rights, Personal Injury Attorneys to Minneapolis Office
-
December 16, 2019Robins Kaplan Named Co-Lead Counsel in Hard Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation
-
January 24, 2020Elimination of Bias: Seeing Juveniles with Justice
-
January 28, 2020Boston 1L Diversity Summer Associate Program Reception
-
January 29-30, 2020American Bar Association Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section Fidelity & Surety Law Midwinter Conference
-
January 10, 2020Top Tips for Trying Your First (or Next) Patent Jury Trial
-
January 2020A Victory for All Involved
-
January 2020Facing the Music: Protecting Photography in the Age of Instagram
Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung
Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung: Brought to resolution patent litigation for Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) against Samsung in the Northern District of California. The case involved allegations that Samsung's DRAM, SRAM and NAND memory products, its system logic products, and its consumer products infringed seven AMD patents covering technologies in memory architecture, processor micro-architecture, MOS-transistor fabrication and design, and user interface design for consumer products. Samsung asserted six patents against AMD's x86 processors and graphics processing units (GPUs) covering technologies in processor micro-architecture design, and semiconductor fabrication and process control. After three years of litigation and two mediations the parties resolved the matter at the close of expert discovery and dispositive motion briefing, shortly before trial. Reputed to be the 4th largest patent case settlement and/or verdict from Jan. 2010-June 2011.
Similar Results
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.