Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung

2010

Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung: Brought to resolution patent litigation for Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) against Samsung in the Northern District of California.  The case involved allegations that Samsung's DRAM, SRAM and NAND memory products, its system logic products, and its consumer products infringed seven AMD patents covering technologies in memory architecture, processor micro-architecture, MOS-transistor fabrication and design, and user interface design for consumer products. Samsung asserted six patents against AMD's x86 processors and graphics processing units (GPUs) covering technologies in processor micro-architecture design, and semiconductor fabrication and process control. After three years of litigation and two mediations the parties resolved the matter at the close of expert discovery and dispositive motion briefing, shortly before trial.  Reputed to be the 4th largest patent case settlement and/or verdict from Jan. 2010-June 2011.

Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation we practice. They do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case, as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.
Disclaimer

Related Practices

Business Litigation Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation

Similar Results

Obtained $14 Million Settlement Against HelloFresh in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Class Action
Business Litigation Class Action Litigation
Represented Gable Steveson in First-of-its-Kind Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Deal with the WWE
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Disputes
$19.5 Million Settlement Secured for Indirect Buyers in Interior Molded Doors Antitrust Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Business Litigation Class Action Litigation
Defended Amneal in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Involving Generic Pulmonary Fibrosis Drug
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation Hatch-Waxman Litigation
Defended Chinese Pharma Co. and CEO of NJ-Based Pharma Co., Successfully Settling Shareholder Derivative Case Alleging Trade Secret Misappropriation
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Business Litigation Trade Secret Litigation
Obtained Complete Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims Asserted against Medical Device Companies for Patents Covering Pulse Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Technology
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation
Successfully Dismissed All Claims Against Medtronic in Case Involving Patent Inventorship, Unjust Enrichment, and Allegations of Trade Secret Misappropriation
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation Trade Secret Litigation
Defended Upsher-Smith in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Involving Isotretinoin Capsules
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Hatch-Waxman Litigation Patent Litigation
Greenthread, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation
Defended Mailchimp and Obtained Dismissal of Patent Litigation Involving Email Content Creation Technology
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation
Obtained Freedom to Operate for Sherwin-Williams through Successful Defense of Patent Infringement Case Involving Antimicrobial Chemicals
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Patent Litigation Patent Office Trials
Defended Supervalu in Extensive Antitrust Class Action Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Appellate Advocacy and Guidance Business Litigation Class Action Litigation
Achieved Extraordinary $6.26 Billion Settlement in Interchange Fee Litigation
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Business Litigation Class Action Litigation
Secured Judgment in Excess of $2 Million for Covidien Against a Former Employee Who Used Confidential Information to Start His Own Company
Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Trade Secret Litigation
Represented Zenara Pharma in Litigation over Cerdelga
Hatch-Waxman Litigation Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
Back to Top