In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation (MDL 2262)

By Stacey Slaughter

April 2022

In multi-district litigation stemming from the alleged manipulation of the LIBOR interest-rate benchmark, on December 30, 2021, the Second Circuit reversed the district court and found that plaintiffs can establish personal jurisdiction through defendants’ participation in a conspiracy operating in the United States. Schwab et al. v. Lloyds et al. (SDNY). The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants, some of the largest financial institutions in the world, colluded to fix U.S. Dollar LIBOR, a financial benchmark used to set floating rates in loans and other financial products, during the 2007 financial crisis. Following the Second Circuit decision, the defendants filed a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court. Robins Kaplan represents the direct action plaintiffs Principal Financial and certain Principal Funds in the MDL.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Stacey Slaughter

Partner

Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group
Deputy Chair, Business Litigation Group
Member of the Executive Board

Related Publications

May 5, 2022
Antitrust Law As A Tool Against Privacy Abuses
Law 360 - William Reiss and Matthew Geyer
First Quarter
ANDA Litigation Settlements
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
First Quarter
New ANDA Cases
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
First Quarter
ANDA Approvals
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
First Quarter
Generic Launches
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
Back to Top