Clear Evidence Clarified
By Eric Lindenfeld
In 2009, the Supreme Court introduced the “clear evidence” standard for the defense of federal preemption in the pharmaceutical products liability context. For the next ten years, the contours of the standard were inconsistently applied by courts. The Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht offers significant clarity to litigants. While certain issues remain unaddressed by the Court, it is clear that the newly stated rule dramatically limits defendants’ ability to assert the clear evidence standard. The rule is a positive step for consumer safety, provides a clear, administrable bright line, and is not unreasonably broad.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.