It's About Them, Not You

February 14, 2020

Too often, lawyers approach oral argument with a misguided mindset. Unlike jury summations, high-school debate, or even the recent presidential impeachment hearings, oral argument to a judge or panel of judges isn’t really supposed to be an argument at all. It should be a conversation—and one for the benefit of the judges, not the advocates—to address the judges’ concerns, thereby demonstrating that your position holds up under scrutiny.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Eric J. Magnuson

Partner

Chair, Appellate Practice
Pronouns: he/his

Related Publications

September 28, 2021
Briefly: Federal appeals: How much notice is enough?
Stephen Safranski and Geoffrey Kozen - Minnesota Lawyer
August 26, 2021
Briefly: Motions for judicial notice in the 8th Circuit
Glenn Danas, Eric Magnuson, Stephen Safranski - Minnesota Lawyer
October 12, 2020
August 10, 2020
June 15, 2020
Back to Top