It's About Them, Not You

February 14, 2020

Too often, lawyers approach oral argument with a misguided mindset. Unlike jury summations, high-school debate, or even the recent presidential impeachment hearings, oral argument to a judge or panel of judges isn’t really supposed to be an argument at all. It should be a conversation—and one for the benefit of the judges, not the advocates—to address the judges’ concerns, thereby demonstrating that your position holds up under scrutiny.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Eric J. Magnuson

Partner

Chair, Appellate Practice
Pronouns: he/his

Stephen P. Safranski

Partner

Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group

Related Publications

July 19, 2022
Briefly: What to do with a Reverse and Remand
Eric Magnuson and Geoffrey Kozen - Minnesota Lawyer
June 21, 2022
Briefly: How To Oppose An Extension If You Really Need To
Lauren J. Coppola and Rebecca Bact - Minnesota Lawyer
May 24, 2022
Briefly: Seeking Fees and Costs While on Appeal
Eric Magnuson, Gregory Voshell - Minnesota Lawyer
April 15, 2022
Briefly: The Persuasive Value of a Well-Crafted Citation
Eric Magnuson, Kaitlin Ek - Minnesota Lawyer
March 22, 2022
Briefly: Deadlines are Tight for Filing Amicus Briefs
Eric Magnuson and Charlie Gokey - Minnesota Lawyer
Back to Top