- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
May 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Celebrates 85 Years
May 17, 2023Minnesota Settles Lawsuit Against JUUL and Altria for $60.5 million
May 16, 2023Robins Kaplan Practice Groups, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
May 30, 2023ACRELive! MOAC (Mall of America) v. Transform Holdco
June 1, 202313th Annual Disability Justice Seminar
June 5, 2023Proposition 65
May 2023Raoul Shah: Keeping Humanity and Compassion Close
May 18, 2023NFT Trademark Defense Comes Down To Licensing Terms
April 20, 2023Drafting Subsequent Agreements to Avoid Arbitrability Litigation
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Claims Handling Practices - Texas
September 3, 2019
Claims Adjusting Standards
Texas prohibits the following unfair claim settlement practices (28 Tex. Admin. Code § 21.203(1)-(19)):
- Misrepresenting to claimants pertinent facts or policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;
- Failing to acknowledge with reasonable promptness pertinent communications with respect to claims arising under its policies, provided that 'pertinent communications' shall exclude written communications that are direct responses to specific inquiries made by the insurer after initial report of a claim. An acknowledgment within 15 business days is presumed to be reasonably prompt;
- Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for prompt investigation of claims arising under its policies;
- Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear;
- Compelling policyholders to institute suits to recover amounts due under its policies by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in suits brought by them;
- Failure of any insurer to maintain, in substantial compliance with § 21.2504 of this title (relating to Complaint Record; Required Elements; Explanation and Instructions), a complete record of all complaints, as that term is defined in § 21.202(4) of this title (relating to Definitions), which it has received during the preceding three years or since the date of its most recent financial examination by the commissioner of insurance, whichever time is shorter. For purposes of this section, 'substantial compliance' has the meaning set out in § 21.2503 of this title (relating to Compliance Standard);
- Failing to provide promptly, when provided for in the policy, claim forms when the insurer requires such forms as a prerequisite for a claim settlement;
- Not attempting in good faith to settle promptly claims where liability has become reasonably clear under one portion of the policy in order to influence settlement under other portions of the policy coverage. (This provision does not apply to those situations where payment under one portion of coverage constitutes evidence of liability under another portion of coverage);
- Failing to provide promptly to a policyholder a reasonable explanation of the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or applicable law for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement;
- Failing to affirm or deny coverage of a claim to a policyholder within a reasonable time. The reasonable submission of a reservation of rights letter by an insurer to a policyholder within a reasonable time is deemed compliance with the provisions of this paragraph;
- Except as may be specifically provided in the policy, to refuse, fail, or unreasonably delay offer of settlement under applicable first-party coverage on the basis that other coverage may be available or third parties are responsible in law for damages suffered;
- Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable person would have believed she/he was entitled by reference to an advertisement, as described in § 21.102 of this title (relating to Scope), made by an insurer or person acting on behalf of an insurer;
- Undertaking to enforce a full and final release from a policyholder when, in fact, only a partial payment has been made. (This provision shall not prevent or have application to the compromise settlement of doubtful or disputed claims);
- Failing to establish a policy and proper controls to make certain that agents calculate and deliver to policyholders or their assignees funds due under policy provisions relative to cancellation of coverage within a reasonable time after such coverages are terminated;
- Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation based upon all available information;
- Failing to respond promptly to a request by a claimant for personal contact about or review of the claim;
- With respect to the Texas personal auto policy, to delay or refuse settlement of a claim solely because there is other insurance of a different type available to satisfy partially or entirely the loss forming the basis of that claim. The claimant who has a right to recover from either or both insurers is entitled to choose under which coverage and in what order payment is to be made;
- A violation of the Insurance Code, Article 21.55, by an insurer subject to its provisions;
- Requiring a claimant, as a condition of settling a claim, to produce the claimant's federal income tax returns for examination or investigation by the insurer unless the claimant is ordered to produce those tax returns by a court of competent jurisdiction, the claim involves a fire loss, or the claim involves a loss of profits or income.
Hurricane Claims Standards
The Texas Department of Insurance issues disaster recovery resources on its website: https://www.tdi.texas.gov/consumer/storms/recoverytips.html
Duty of Good Faith
Texas recognizes a common law cause of action for first-party insurer bad faith. Under Texas law, an insurer has a duty to fairly and in good faith process and pay claims. This duty is breached when: (1) no reasonable basis exists for denying or delaying payment of benefits under the policy; and (2) the insurer knew or should have known that no reasonable basis existed for denying or delaying payment of the claim. Transp. Ins. Co. v. Moriel, 879 S.W.2d 10, 17-18 (Tex. 1994).
Texas also allows an insured to bring a separate statutory claim under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, codified at Tex. Ins. Code § 541.151. Prohibited conduct, enumerated at Tex. Ins. Code § 541.060, includes:
- Misrepresenting a material fact or policy provision relating to coverage.
- Failure to attempt, in good faith, a prompt, fair, and equitable settlement when coverage on a claim has become clear.
- Failure to provide an explanation of a denial.
- Failure to affirm or deny coverage, or submit a reservation of rights, within a reasonable time.
- Unreasonably denying settlement on the basis that other coverage may be available, or third parties are reasonable except as specifically provided in the policy.
- Failure to pay a claim without conducting a reasonable investigation.
An insurer found liable under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act may be liable for: (1) actual damages; (2) court costs and attorney fees; and (3) treble damages in the event the insurer acted knowingly. Tex. Ins. Code § 541.152.
While it is possible for an insurer to face bad faith exposure in the absence of coverage, extra-contractual liability will only arise if the insurer’s conduct was extreme and caused damages unrelated to and independent of the contract claim. Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boyd, 177 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. 2005).
Independent and Public Adjusters
Independent insurance adjusters are governed by Tex. Ins. Code § 4101 and public insurance adjusters are governed by § 4102. Under authority granted by the later statute, public insurance adjusters are also subject to a “Code of Ethics” codified at 28 Tex. Admin. Code § 19.713.
Communication, Investigation, and Payment Deadlines
Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 542.055(a)(1)-(3), .056(a)-(d), .057(a)-(c) (2005).
Must acknowledge pertinent communications regarding claims within 15 business days.
Must acknowledge receipt of first-party claim within 15 days after the date of receipt of notice of claim.
Commence investigation of first-party claim within 15 days after the date of receipt of notice of claim.
Request from first-party claimant all items, statements, and forms that will be required from claimant within 15 days after the date of receipt of notice of the claim.
Notify first-party claimant in writing of the acceptance or rejection of a claim within 15 business days of receipt of all items, statements, and forms required to secure final proof of loss. When an insurer rejects a claim, it must state the reasons for rejecting the claim.
If additional time is needed to determine acceptance or rejection of first-party claim, notify claimant of reasons additional time is needed within 15 business days after the date of receipt of all items, statements, and forms required to secure final proof of loss.
After notifying first-party claimant that additional time to determine acceptance or rejection of a claim is needed, notify claimant in writing of the acceptance or rejection of a claim within 45 days after the date of notification that additional time is needed.
Pay first-party claim if claimant is notified that claim or part of claim will be paid within 5 business days after the date notice is given.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Damned if You Don’t
In Times of Crisis:
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.