- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
-
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
-
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
-
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
-
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
-
April 19, 2023FBA Women in MDL, Mass and Class Leadership
-
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
-
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
-
March 2023How an Investor Can Lose More Than Just Their Investment
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Tallying Repetitive Inter Partes Review Challenges
How many bites at the apple does the Patent Trial and Appeal Board allow?
September 14, 2018
Law360, (September 14, 2018, 5:09 PM EDT) -- How many bites at the apple does the Patent Trial and Appeal Board allow? That is, are parties limited to a single invalidity challenge to a patent claim in inter partes review, or are parties able to file serial challenges against a claim? While the statutes governing this important question may be open to interpretation on this fundamental question, the PTAB has adopted a decidedly permissive approach. This article reviews the statutory and legislative background and the empirical facts of current practice, and offers some strategic pointers for offense and defense at the PTAB.
All Content © 2018, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Steven C. Carlson
Partner
Ryan M. Schultz
Prior Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.