A Back-To-Basics Approach To Patent Damages Law
For the last 10 years, the Federal Circuit has issued a series of damages opinions specific to the facts of each case, such as Lucent, LaserDynamics and VirnetX.
February 14, 2018
Law360, February 14, 2018, 3:40 PM EST -- For the last 10 years, the Federal Circuit has issued a series of damages opinions specific to the facts of each case, such as Lucent, LaserDynamics and VirnetX. In several of these opinions, it has generalized prior fact-specific holdings into patent law “rules” and attempted to fit each rule to the next unique fact pattern. By converting fact-specific holdings into patent-specific “rules” without acknowledging fundamental legal principles, the Federal Circuit has created a substantial risk of uncertainty in the trial courts and in the patent system as a whole. The patent community would benefit from the law of patent damages going back to fundamental tort and evidentiary principles.
All Content © 2003‐2017, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Christine Yun Sauer
Danielle S. Rosenthal
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.