- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
June 7, 2023Partner Tim Billion Honored With 2023 Appellate Advocacy Award
June 6, 2023Super Lawyers Names Five Attorneys to “Southern California Rising Stars” List
June 1, 2023Chambers USA Recognizes Five Robins Kaplan Practice Groups and 17 Lawyers in 2023 Guide
June 13, 20232023 Probate and Trust Law Section Conference
June 14, 2023Leading Through Uncertainty
June 15, 2023Enhance Your Super Powers by Clerking
May 2023Raoul Shah: Keeping Humanity and Compassion Close
May 18, 2023NFT Trademark Defense Comes Down To Licensing Terms
April 20, 2023Drafting Subsequent Agreements to Avoid Arbitrability Litigation
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
How ITC Applied Inter Partes Review Estoppel In Ford Case
December 1, 2017
Law360, December 1, 2017, 1:53 PM EST -- In Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, Administrative Law Judge David P. Shaw issued an initial determination estopping The Ford Motor Company from challenging the validity of Paice LLC’s patents using the same grounds that Ford had previously raised before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in inter partes reviews. The potentially unusual issue here, though, is that Ford won the IPRs, successfully invalidating 272 of Paice’s claims. At issue in Certain Hybrid Vehicles were eight patent claims. Six of those claims had been held invalid at the PTAB and were on appeal to the Federal Circuit. One claim had been found valid at the PTAB, and one claim had been found invalid, but the Federal Circuit had vacated and remanded that determination. Relying on a strict reading of the IPR estoppel provision, ALJ Shaw found that it was irrelevant to the estoppel determination that Ford had been successful at the PTAB. Stated differently, ALJ Shaw concluded that the estoppel provision applies after a final decision on both successful and unsuccessful IPRs. This initial determination appears significant because (1) it continues the trend of the U.S. International Trade Commission issuing patent owner-friendly rulings in spite of conflicting PTAB rulings, and (2) the decision may flag a provision of the America Invents Act for clarification by the Federal Circuit on appeal or by Congress.
All Content © 2003‐2017, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.