- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
February 24, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP Partners with University of South Dakota for Annual Moot Court Competition
-
February 20, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP and Partner Hollis Salzman Named Finalists for Global Competition Review’s 2020 Antitrust Awards
-
February 14, 2020Robins Kaplan Recognized in 2020 World Trademark Review 1000
-
March 2, 2020Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
-
March 4, 2020The Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles 25th Annual Litigators Forum
-
March 4, 2020Women in Legal and Corporate Leadership Summit
-
February 11, 2020INSIGHT: California’s Rebuke of Forced Arbitration in Limbo, Full of Uncertainty
-
February 7, 2020Colossus and Xactimate: A Tale of Two AI Insurance Software Programs
-
February 2020Have You Seen My Genes? Preconception Carrier Screening
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Rest Period Compliance Guidance
March 8, 2017
Last year, the California Supreme Court held that employer’s discretion to provide employees with on-duty meal periods does not apply to rest periods. Augustus v. ABM Sec. Servs. Inc., 2 Cal. 5th 257 (2016). The Supreme Court had previously outlined an employer’s obligation to provide meal periods in Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. 4th 1004, 1017 (2012). Augustus clarifies Brinker by holding that employees cannot be required to be “on call” during rest periods. This holding provides valuable insight for California employers.
Reprinted with permission from the Daily Journal. ©2017 Daily Journal Corporation. All rights reserved.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
Daily Journal
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
David Martinez
Partner
Christina M. Lincoln
Associate
Related Publications
January 2020
A Victory for All Involved
The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update: Winter 2020
January 2020
Facing the Music: Protecting Photography in the Age of Instagram
The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update: Winter 2020
January 2020
Interview with Marian Pardo, Managing Director and Principal of Virtual Capital Management, LLC
The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update: Winter 2020
Summer 2019
Pixel Perfect: The Legal Implications of Virtual Influencers and Supermodels
The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update: Summer 2019
Summer 2019
Pixel Perfect: The Legal Implications of Virtual Influencers and Supermodels
The Robins Kaplan Business Law Update Summer 2019
Related News
October 22, 2019
September 6, 2019
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.