Applying 'Footprint' Methodology To Prism V. Sprint

March 21, 2017

Law360, New York (March 21, 2017, 3:02 PM EDT) -- The "footprint" approach to patent damages synthesizes the profit equation P = R - C, causation, Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (probative value v. prejudicial effect), and Rule 702 (expert reliability). This framework provides a holistic and consistent way to integrate and apply the Federal Circuit’s opinions on damages issues.[1] The March 7 decision in Prism Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum[2] affirming a $30 million jury verdict illustrates yet another footprint application, interesting because of its focus on costs — and not revenues — as a reasonable royalty measure.

All Content © 2003‐2017, Portfolio Media, Inc.


The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.


Related Publications

November 2020
Explaining the Almost Unexplainable
David Prange, Benjamen Linden, Vivek Biswas - Intellectual Property Magazine
October 2, 2020
Does an AB Rating Fill Out a Skinny Label?
Jeffrey Alan Hovden, Oren D. Langer
September 22, 2020
Herbal Patent Protection
Shui Li - 闻宁阁 American Intellectual Property
August 26, 2020
INSIGHT: Avoiding Trade Secret Claims After Seeing a Competitor’s Crown Jewels
Jake Holdreith, David Prange, Emily Tremblay - Bloomberg Law
Back to Top