- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
February 24, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP Partners with University of South Dakota for Annual Moot Court Competition
-
February 20, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP and Partner Hollis Salzman Named Finalists for Global Competition Review’s 2020 Antitrust Awards
-
February 14, 2020Robins Kaplan Recognized in 2020 World Trademark Review 1000
-
March 2, 2020Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
-
March 4, 2020The Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles 25th Annual Litigators Forum
-
March 4, 2020Women in Legal and Corporate Leadership Summit
-
February 11, 2020INSIGHT: California’s Rebuke of Forced Arbitration in Limbo, Full of Uncertainty
-
February 7, 2020Colossus and Xactimate: A Tale of Two AI Insurance Software Programs
-
February 2020Have You Seen My Genes? Preconception Carrier Screening
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Whirlpool Effect: What if Petitioners Must Prove Proposed Amended Claims Are Unpatentable in IPRs?
September 21, 2016
Soon, the Federal Circuit will decide whether the patent owner or the petitioner bears the burden to prove whether proposed substitute claims in an inter partes review (IPR) are patentable or unpatentable. Currently, the patent owner bears the burden to prove patentability. However, if the Federal Circuit were to change who bears the burden, there could be significant unintended consequences. This article considers some potential issues that could arise if the burden is shifted to the petitioner.
Copyright © 2016 by the Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
Related Publications
September 22, 2019
Weaponizing IPRs
Landslide
September 14, 2018
June 21, 2018
March 2018
February 21, 2017
PTAB Issues Key Decision Over Revolutionary CRISPR Technology, but this Tale is Not Over Yet
Globe Business Media Group
Related News
October 16, 2018
May 22, 2018
June 8, 2017
February 9, 2017
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.