3D Printing of Medical Devices

Strict liability, which is traditionally applied in the products liability landscape, is not easily applied in the context of 3D printing of medical products.

2016

The potential framework for tort liability for the 3D printing of medical devices is highly questionable.  Strict liability, which is traditionally applied in the products liability landscape, is not easily applied in the context of 3D printing of medical products.  This problem becomes increasingly troublesome when one considers that  experts predict that the first wave of consumers will suffer grave injuries as a result of defects in these medical products. This paper proposes that the CAD designer of a CAD blueprint should be held strictly liable for defects arising out of its designs. Hospitals and 3D Printer Manufacturers should be held liable only under negligence standards.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Related Publications

September 22, 2020
Herbal Patent Protection
Shui Li - 闻宁阁 American Intellectual Property
August 26, 2020
INSIGHT: Avoiding Trade Secret Claims After Seeing a Competitor’s Crown Jewels
Jake Holdreith, David Prange, Emily Tremblay - Bloomberg Law
July 2020
Hatch-Waxman Patent Litigation Strategies
Jeffrey Alan Hovden - LexisNexis
June 2020
Trade Secrets: Safe as Houses
Christopher Larus, David Prange, Alyssa Bixby-Lawson - Intellectual Property Magazine
Back to Top