Allocating Additional Profits between the Patentee and the Infringer Using the Footprint Methodology
Case law requires that a proper royalty award isolate the value of the patented invention from any nonpatented features. However, the court has provided little guidance on the question of how to allocate that value between the patentee and the infringer.
If nothing else, current Federal Circuit case law is clear on one thing: in calculating a reasonable royalty owed for a defendant’s infringing acts, some effort should be taken to identify the value of the patented invention separate from the value of the nonpatented features. That said, judicial guidance is conspicuously absent on one important question: After identifying profits attributable to the claimed invention, how should those profits be allocated between the patentee and the infringer?
Originally published in Insights Issue 107 (Spring 2016)
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.