O’Bannon And Alternative Forms Of Injunctive Relief
November 23, 2015
Law360, New York (November 19, 2015, 10:13 AM ET) -- In O'Bannon v. NCAA, the Ninth Circuit held that NCAA regulations barring compensation to student-athletes are subject to antitrust scrutiny under the Sherman Act’s rule-of-reason analysis. The court upheld the district court’s order enjoining the NCAA from prohibiting its member schools from giving student-athletes scholarships up to the full cost of attendance at their respective schools. In an interesting twist, however, the court reversed the district court’s injunction that would have entitled student-athletes to up to $5,000 per year in deferred compensation, to be held in trust for student-athletes until after college.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.