- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Made in the USA? Or not?
October 30, 2015
When can a company tout its products as "Made in the USA"? Different (sometimes conflicting) standards under federal and state law can make it difficult for shoppers to know what they’re buying and manufacturers and retailers to know when it’s safe to label their products as American-made. Fortunately, a change in California law has just made this easier. On September 1, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a bill relaxing the requirements for the "Made in the USA" label, making California’s labeling law more consistent with federal standards.
California has long regulated what products can be labeled "Made in the USA." In California, it’s now legal to sell products labeled "Made in the USA," "Made in America," "USA," or similar words "if all of the articles, units, or parts of the merchandise obtained from outside the United States constitute not more than 5 percent of the final wholesale value of the manufactured product." Before this change, California required virtually every atom of the product to be made in the USA—a rare occurrence in today’s global economy.
The federal government also imposes regulations on manufacturers and retailers who want to label their products as "Made in the U.S.A," although it does not use bright-line percentages like California’s law. Under Federal Trade Commission regulations, products advertised as "Made in the U.S.A." must be "all or virtually all" made in the United States. A product is "all or virtually all" made in the U.S. if "all significant parts and processing that go into the product [are] of U.S. origin."
California’s new law helps reconcile the differences between the two standards. In addition to the 5% threshold, the law also allows products to carry this label if less than 10% of the wholesale value is foreign-made, and the foreign elements cannot be made or purchased in the U.S. With these changes, California’s laws are more closely aligned with the FTC’s requirements
Despite California’s attempt to reconcile its own laws with the federal standards, some federal lawmakers are hoping to resolve any potential conflict by placing country-of-origin labels under the exclusive control of the federal government. The proposed "Reinforcing American-Made Products Act of 2015" would supersede state laws. The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation is currently considering the bill. If it passes, standards would become uniform across the U.S., simplifying requirements on manufacturers and retailers who will no longer need to meet potentially conflicting state requirements. The senators sponsoring the bill also hope that it will help companies who keep manufacturing jobs stateside rather than outsourcing internationally.
While companies may have more freedom to use the "Made in the USA" label now, they must still remain vigilant that they are falling within the California safe harbor if selling products in California. Failing to do so will likely attract unwanted false advertising litigation.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Kaitlyn Johnson
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.