Convergence: A Common Framework for Lost Profits and Reasonable Royalty Damages Using the Footprint Approach
The patent litigation bench and bar view lost profits and reasonable royalties as two entirely separate forms of damages with separate bodies of law. But both arise from the same statute (§ 284) and its early interpretation by the U .S. Supreme Court. The economic underpinnings of the two are the same. The dramatic fork the two approaches have taken has unnecessarily increased the complexity and transaction cost of patent negotiations and litigation, imposing heavy burdens on both the parties and the courts. The “footprint” approach set forth previously in the context of reasonable royalty damages provides a framework for returning to convergence between lost profits and reasonable royalty measures of patent damages.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.