- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP™
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLPTM
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
October 14, 2021K. Craig Wildfang Selected to Receive 2021 Minnesota Icon Award
-
October 13, 2021Robins Kaplan Files U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on Behalf of Former National Security Advisors and Army Generals
-
October 12, 2021Boston Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
-
October 19, 2021ACI Virtual Proficiency Series: Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA
-
October 19, 2021Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota 25th Anniversary Virtual Gala
-
October 25, 2021Women’s Bar Association of Massachusetts (WBA) 2021 Gala
-
Fall 2021Are All Fiduciaries Created Equal?
-
Fall 2021Context Matters: Fiduciaries and the Rule Against Self-Dealing
-
Fall 2021Update on DOL Fiduciary Rule
-
October 15, 2021Financial Daily Dose 10.15.2021 | Top Story: LinkedIn Shuts Down Site Access in China
-
October 14, 2021Financial Daily Dose 10.14.2021 | Top Story: CPI Jumps More than 5%, Raising Fears of Stubborn Inflation
-
October 13, 2021Financial Daily Dose 10.13.2021 | Top Story: Record 4.3 Million Americans Voluntarily Left Jobs in August
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
SEPs Don't Need A Different Reasonable Royalty Analysis
March 24, 2015
A modified Georgia‐Pacific analysis? A different selection of Georgia‐Pacific factors to include in the damages jury instruction for each case? A restriction on the date of hypothetical negotiation for any standard‐essential patent? Please, courts, do not continue to impose these requirements or adopt any new “rules” specific to reasonable royalty damages for SEPs. The fact that a patented invention is essential to practicing a standard does not necessitate a change in the damages analysis, if carried out properly.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.