- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP™
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
July 21, 2021Benchmark Litigation Names Patrick Arenz and Aaron Fahrenkrog to its 40 & Under Hot List in 2021
-
July 20, 2021Five Robins Kaplan Firm Members Recognized by Minnesota Lawyer
-
July 19, 2021Robins Kaplan Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Minnesota Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
-
July 26, 2021Tee It up for the Troops
-
August 5, 2021Domesticating an Out of State Judgment in The State of Florida
-
August 6, 2021Mastering the Deposition: 30(b)(6) Deposition Strategies and Updates 2021
-
July 15, 2021Biotechnology & Trade Secret Protection
-
July 6, 2021'Abuse of dominance': Was this what Congress originally intended for Section 2?
-
Summer 2021Family Feud: A Cautionary Tale of the Costs, Risks, and Uncertainty of Minority-Shareholder Litigation
-
July 23, 2021Financial Daily Dose 7.23.2021 | Top Story: Amazon Abruptly Drops Mandatory Arbitration Requirement
-
July 22, 2021Financial Daily Dose 7.22.2021 | Top Story: Drug Companies Strike $26B Deal with State AGs Over Opioid Crisis
-
July 21, 2021Financial Daily Dose 7.21.2021 | Top Story: White House Names Google Critic Kanter to Lead DOJ Antitrust Division
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
SEPs Don't Need A Different Reasonable Royalty Analysis
March 24, 2015
A modified Georgia‐Pacific analysis? A different selection of Georgia‐Pacific factors to include in the damages jury instruction for each case? A restriction on the date of hypothetical negotiation for any standard‐essential patent? Please, courts, do not continue to impose these requirements or adopt any new “rules” specific to reasonable royalty damages for SEPs. The fact that a patented invention is essential to practicing a standard does not necessitate a change in the damages analysis, if carried out properly.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Law360
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
Related Publications
July 15, 2021
Biotechnology & Trade Secret Protection
Sharon Roberg-Perez, David Prange, Ellen Levish - Bloomberg Law
June 8, 2021
Written Description in the Life Sciences: The Devil is in the Details
Sharon Roberg-Perez, William Jones - IPWatchdog
May 5, 2021
Bio-Rad Ruling Highlights IP Assignment Clause Limits
Bryan J. Vogel, Derrick J. Carman - Law360
April 20, 2021
Copyright Concerns For NFT Buyers, Sellers In Music Industry
Carly Kessler - Law360
March 26, 2021
Trends In Video Game Company Quests To Arbitrate Cases
Matthew Woods, Austin Miller - Law360
Related News
July 21, 2021
June 16, 2021
May 20, 2021
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.