- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
May 26, 2020K. Craig Wildfang Named Titan of the Plaintiffs Bar by Law360
-
May 14, 2020Aaron Sheanin Appointed to Board of Directors for Legal Aid at Work
-
May 13, 2020Meegan Hollywood Named to Global Competition Review’s 40 Under 40
-
June 1, 2020Taking and Defending Depositions: Strategic Tips and Techniques
-
June 11, 2020MedtechWomen Panel: Women Innovating through COVID-19
-
June 23, 2020Pride Month CLE: Current Legal Issues Impacting LGBTQ Equity
-
May 18, 2020DOJ Signs Off On First COVID-Related Competitor Collaboration Not Involving Medical Supplies
-
May 11, 2020Competitor Collaborations and Covid-19—Antitrust Considerations
-
May 6, 2020Hatch-Waxman Litigation Venue Update Post-Google
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
SEPs Don't Need A Different Reasonable Royalty Analysis
March 24, 2015
A modified Georgia‐Pacific analysis? A different selection of Georgia‐Pacific factors to include in the damages jury instruction for each case? A restriction on the date of hypothetical negotiation for any standard‐essential patent? Please, courts, do not continue to impose these requirements or adopt any new “rules” specific to reasonable royalty damages for SEPs. The fact that a patented invention is essential to practicing a standard does not necessitate a change in the damages analysis, if carried out properly.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
Law360
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
Related Publications
May 6, 2020
Hatch-Waxman Litigation Venue Update Post-Google
Kelsey McElveen, Ellen Levish - Bloomberg Law
May 4, 2020
Explaining The Almost Unexplainable: Source Code Evidence At Trial
David Prange, Benjamen Linden - LegalTech News
April 7, 2020
Protecting Confidential Information When Sheltering in Place
David Prange, Chris Larus - Corporate Counsel
April 1, 2020
Navigating Software License Disputes in Today’s Evolving Work-From-Home Paradigm
Bryan Mechell, Ellen Levish
March 27, 2020
Related News
March 24, 2020
September 16, 2019
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.