- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
April 14, 2021Robins Kaplan Secures Asylum, Relative Petition for Somali Journalist
-
April 12, 2021Robins Kaplan Executives Recognized by Twin Cities Business
-
April 1, 2021Robert Bennett Named a Midwest Trailblazer
-
April 28, 2021Creating the Audit Clause for Today’s Compliance Review
-
April 29, 2021International Intellectual Property: Challenges of Cross-Border Litigation
-
April 29, 2021Breakthrough Greater Boston Reflections on Resilience Virtual Gala
-
April 13, 2021US Antitrust Regulators Should Foster Climate Collaboration
-
April 2, 2021Prepare For Minn. Privacy Law To Catch Up To Calif., Wash.
-
Spring 2021Fiduciary or Foe? Revisiting Meinhard v. Salmon
-
April 15, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.15.2021 | Top Story: Big Banks Deliver Huge Q1 Profits, Economic Optimism Despite Ongoing Challenges
-
April 14, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.14.2021 | Top Story: Crypto Exchange Coinbase Makes Public Debut on Nasdaq
-
April 13, 2021Financial Daily Dose 4.13.2021 | Top Story: Ant Group Agrees to Sweeping Overhaul to Appease Chinese Regulators
SEPs Don't Need A Different Reasonable Royalty Analysis
March 24, 2015
A modified Georgia‐Pacific analysis? A different selection of Georgia‐Pacific factors to include in the damages jury instruction for each case? A restriction on the date of hypothetical negotiation for any standard‐essential patent? Please, courts, do not continue to impose these requirements or adopt any new “rules” specific to reasonable royalty damages for SEPs. The fact that a patented invention is essential to practicing a standard does not necessitate a change in the damages analysis, if carried out properly.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.