- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
January 20, 2022Robins Kaplan Partners Named to 2022 IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders Guide
-
January 5, 2022Manleen Singh Promoted to Counsel
-
January 3, 2022Stacey Slaughter and Steve Safranski Named Co-Chairs of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group
-
January 27, 2022Indian Arts and Crafts Acts for Attorneys
-
February 3, 2022Loss Executives Association 91st Annual Meeting & Educational Conference
-
February 3, 2022Loss Executives Association 91st Annual Meeting & Educational Conference
-
January 25, 2022Patrick Arenz | Richard H. Tholen, M.D. v. Assist America, Inc. | $27.8 million verdict
-
January 18, 2022Briefly: A User's Guide for Post-Trial Motions
-
January 17, 2022Is This the End of Mandatory Arbitration? Turning the Tables With Mass Arbitration
-
January 26, 2022Choppy Markets Await Fed Policy Guidance
-
January 25, 2022Markets Rebound on Wild Monday, Confirming Volatility’s Hold
-
January 21, 2022New Fed Report Kicks Off Central Bank Digital Currency Debate
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
SEPs Don't Need A Different Reasonable Royalty Analysis
March 24, 2015
A modified Georgia‐Pacific analysis? A different selection of Georgia‐Pacific factors to include in the damages jury instruction for each case? A restriction on the date of hypothetical negotiation for any standard‐essential patent? Please, courts, do not continue to impose these requirements or adopt any new “rules” specific to reasonable royalty damages for SEPs. The fact that a patented invention is essential to practicing a standard does not necessitate a change in the damages analysis, if carried out properly.
All Content © 2003‐2015, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.