A Modest Proposal to Disturb the Sound of Appellate Silence: Why the Eighth Circuit Should Articulate a Rule 23(f) Standard for Appeals of Class Certification Decisions

February 13, 2015

More often than not, in class actions, the district court’s decision on class certification is the pivotal moment—the “crucial inflection point” in the case. The denial of class certification often spells the end of the litigation because it is no longer economically feasible to continue an individual suit; the grant of class certification can have the same effect for the defendant, by creating extraordinary settlement pressure on a defendant. As a result, “the fight over class certification is often the whole ballgame,” where the economics of litigation force the loser to retreat from the field of play, and the class certification decision itself becomes effectively unreviewable.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.


Stephen P. Safranski


Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group

Related Publications

December 7, 2022
Briefly: Electing Justice: How to Judge Judges
Eric Magnuson - Minnesota Lawyer
November 30, 2022
SCOTUS Term in Review
Ryan Marth and Caitlinrose Fisher - Eight Circuit Fall 2022 Newsletter
November 15, 2022
Briefly: Behind the Veil of Judicial Recusal
Eric Magnuson - Minnesota Lawyer
November 1, 2022
Briefly: 'Extraordinary Circumstances' For Relief from Judgment
Eric Magnuson, Brandon Carmack - Minnesota Lawyer
September 27, 2022
Briefly: 8th Circuit Introduces Quality Control Aid for Briefs
Eric Magnuson and Sandra Badin - Minnesota Lawyer
Back to Top