5 Takeaways From FTC Actions Against Professional Boards

November 03, 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission cast the FTC’s scrutiny of competitor-controlled boards into the national spotlight. While the North Carolina Dental case has been the FTC’s most high-profile recent challenge to the rules of professional boards and associations, two recent consent decrees — one with the National Association of Teachers of Singing (NATS) and another with the National Association of Residential Property Managers (NARPM) — underscore that competitor-controlled groups remain a priority for the commission. This article provides a brief description of both investigations and provides five takeaways from the FTC’s enforcement actions against competitor-controlled boards.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.


Related Publications

March 14, 2024
How Many Cases Have You Tried to a Verdict?
Gabriel Berg, Lauren Coppola - New York Law Journal
January 3, 2024
Navigating Class Actions After Papa John's Settlement Denial
Law360 - William Reiss, Ellen Jalkut, Laura Song
Fall 2023
All Is Not Lost: Personal Jurisdiction in a Post-BMS World
Meegan Hollywood, Jonathan Edelman - Antitrust Magazine
August 21, 2023
Colorado Expands Antitrust Protection
William Reiss and Ellen Jalkut - Colorado State Antitrust Act of 2023
August 7, 2023
Back to Top