The Eight Corners Rule: Uncertainty On Duty To Defend
Importance of whether a state looks beyond policy and underlying complaint to determine CGL insurer’s duty to defend property damage claim.
April 4, 2014
Law360, New York (April 04, 2014, 5:44 PM ET) ‐‐ When determining whether there is a duty to defend allegations of property damage under a commercial general liability policy, it can matter a good deal whether a court looks only to the policy and underlying complaint or to other documents as well. Two recent federal cases from adjoining southern states demonstrate this effect.
All Content © 2003‐2014, Portfolio Media, Inc.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.