- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
August 6, 2020Hollis Salzman Named to Benchmark Litigation's Top 250 Women in Litigation List
-
July 31, 2020Patrick Arenz and Aaron Fahrenkrog named to Benchmark Litigation 40 & Under Hot List
-
July 27, 2020Christine Yun Sauer Shortlisted for Chambers Diversity and Inclusion Awards
-
August 11, 2020Century City Bar Association Distinguished Speaker Series
-
August 12, 13, 19 and 20, 2020Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) 38th Annual Meeting and Virtual Convention
-
August 14, 2020Notable Recent & Pending Class Action Cases in the 9th Circuit and SCOTUS
-
August 3, 2020Request for Amici: Tell SCOTUS to Incentivize Original Fictional Characters through Copyright
-
Summer 2020ANDA Approvals
-
Summer 2020ANDA Litigation Settlements
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
IP: 3D Printing Patent Litigation Now: The Shape of Things to Come?
A review of the 3D printing patent infringement claims recently brought by industry leaders in 3D Systems v. Formlabs and Stratsys v. Afinia.
January 07, 2014
3D printing industry-leaders Stratasys and 3D Systems have each recently begun noteworthy patent infringement litigation actions. Brought against rivals who offer lower-priced consumer printers, these cases could end up playing an important role in just how quickly 3D printing can cross the chasm to consumer acceptance — and at what cost. Because the litigation also seems to signal a strategic shift by each of the innovator patent-holders, both actions merit further review.
Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
InsideCounsel
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
Bryan J. Vogel
Partner
Related Publications
August 3, 2020
Request for Amici: Tell SCOTUS to Incentivize Original Fictional Characters through Copyright
Patrick Arenz - IPWatchdog
July 2020
Hatch-Waxman Patent Litigation Strategies
Jeffrey Alan Hovden - LexisNexis
June 2020
Trade Secrets: Safe as Houses
Christopher Larus, David Prange, Alyssa Bixby-Lawson - Intellectual Property Magazine
June 4, 2020
Explaining the Almost Unexplainable: Preparing and Presenting Source Code Evidence at Trial
David Prange, Benjamen Linden - LegalTech News
May 6, 2020
Hatch-Waxman Litigation Venue Update Post-Google
Kelsey McElveen, Ellen Levish - Bloomberg Law
Related News
June 15, 2020
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.