IP: 3D Printing Can Create Trade Secrets Misappropriation Opportunities | Resources | Robins Kaplan LLP Law Firm

Review of trade secret law and how 3D printing expansion and consolidation may fuel future 3D industry trade secret misappropriation claims.

December 10, 2013

Though trade secret questions have not yet taken up as much of the conversation surrounding 3D printing and IP litigation, 3D printing is ripe for trade secret conflicts. In general, increased employee mobility has produced more risk of disclosure for all trade secret owners. When it comes to 3D printing and its related technologies, the industry’s rapid expansion and consolidation make those with 3D printing experience particularly enticing targets for recruitment — and creates more opportunities for potential misappropriation of 3D printing industry trade secrets.

Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

InsideCounsel

READ FULL ARTICLE

Bryan J. Vogel

Partner

June 14, 2023

Illinois Trade Secret Dispute Proceeds on Theory of Inevitable Disclosure

Sherry Roberg-Perez - IAM

April 12, 2023

Statute of Limitations is a Key Issue in Delaware Trade Secret Dispute

Sharon Roberg-Perez - IAM

March 2023

Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements

Michael Geibelson, Stephen Safranski, Michael Pacelli - Bloomberg Law

February 22, 2023

A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets

Chris Larus, David Prange, Rajin Olson - The National Law Journal

February 7, 2023

When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement

David Martinez and Zac Cohen - Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal

March 15, 2018

Intellectual Property Litigator Steven Carlson Joins Robins Kaplan LLP as Partner in Silicon Valley

Back to Top

Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.

If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.

By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.