Learning to Stand Again: Revisiting RMBS Class Claims in Light of NECA-IBEW
Possible new life for residential mortgage-backed securities market class action claims after the NECA-IBEW decision from the Second Circuit.
November 25, 2013
In the last few years, some courts developed a trend that limited investors from representing others in cases for fraud in the residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) market. Specifically, certain courts precluded class plaintiffs from suing for those who purchased securities derived from the same shelf statement but who did not purchase the same security. Other courts limited classes to investors in the same trust (regardless of tranche level). But those limitations, at least for some, were lifted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. Goldman Sachs & Co.,1 so it may be time to rethink class membership.
Published by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. in the November/December 2013 issue of The Banking Law Journal. Copyright © 2013 Reed Elsevier Properties SA.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.