Timing Is Everything
In Fresenius v Baxter, a split Federal Circuit says timing allows USPTO outcome to void earlier district court patent lawsuit adjudication.
September 9, 2013
Just last year, the Federal Circuit endorsed the potential for different outcomes in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and in district court patent litigation.1 Short on the heels of that decision, the Federal Circuit has now concluded that, in certain circumstances, a later outcome obtained at the USPTO can override and void a district court’s adjudication of a lawsuit. In Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc,2 a spilt panel of the Federal Circuit highlights how significantly a patent holder’s fortune might change depending on the timing and nature of a decision from a district court or the USPTO or, as in the case of patent-holder Baxter, both forums.
1. In re Baxter Int’l, Inc, 678 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (“Baxter I”).
2. Nos. 2012-1334, 2012-1335, 2013 US App. LEXIS 13484 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 2, 2013) (“Baxter II”).
Reprinted with permission from Intellectual Property Magazine
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.