- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
May 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Celebrates 85 Years
May 17, 2023Minnesota Settles Lawsuit Against JUUL and Altria for $60.5 million
May 16, 2023Robins Kaplan Practice Groups, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
May 30, 2023ACRELive! MOAC (Mall of America) v. Transform Holdco
June 1, 202313th Annual Disability Justice Seminar
June 5, 2023Proposition 65
May 2023Raoul Shah: Keeping Humanity and Compassion Close
May 18, 2023NFT Trademark Defense Comes Down To Licensing Terms
April 20, 2023Drafting Subsequent Agreements to Avoid Arbitrability Litigation
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Timing Is Everything
In Fresenius v Baxter, a split Federal Circuit says timing allows USPTO outcome to void earlier district court patent lawsuit adjudication.
September 9, 2013
Just last year, the Federal Circuit endorsed the potential for different outcomes in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and in district court patent litigation.1 Short on the heels of that decision, the Federal Circuit has now concluded that, in certain circumstances, a later outcome obtained at the USPTO can override and void a district court’s adjudication of a lawsuit. In Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc,2 a spilt panel of the Federal Circuit highlights how significantly a patent holder’s fortune might change depending on the timing and nature of a decision from a district court or the USPTO or, as in the case of patent-holder Baxter, both forums.
1. In re Baxter Int’l, Inc, 678 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (“Baxter I”).
2. Nos. 2012-1334, 2012-1335, 2013 US App. LEXIS 13484 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 2, 2013) (“Baxter II”).
Reprinted with permission from Intellectual Property Magazine
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.