- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
September 14, 2022Christopher Larus Named to IAM Strategy 300 List Of Leading IP Strategists
-
September 13, 2022Daniel Allender Named Lawyer on The Fast Track by The Recorder In 2022 California Legal Awards
-
September 12, 2022Kellie Lerner Recognized As Leading Competition Plaintiff Lawyer by Who’s Who Legal
-
September 28-29, 20225th Annual LF Dealmakers Forum: Advancing Litigation Finance
-
September 28, 2022Minnesota Justice Foundation
-
September 29, 2022Connecting with BIPOC Clients: Understanding Your Implicit Cultural Bias
-
September 13, 2022Patent Value: Scoring Patents Using Characteristics Of Patents In Litigation
-
September 202215 Years Later: The I-35 Bridge Collapse and the Lessons Carried On
-
September 2022Update on Exactech Knee, Hip, and Ankle Implant Recall Lawsuit
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
The Never Ending Story
Lessons from US v Penguin Group, the government’s antitrust, ebook price-fixing case against Apple and other ‘big six’ US book publishers.
September 9, 2013
On 10 July 2013, US district judge Denise Cote issued her lengthy opinion and order in US v Penguin Group, the government’s antitrust case against Apple, and five of the ‘big six’ US book publishers, following the government’s trial against Apple, (the publishers having settled previously).
Reprinted with permission from Intellectual Property Magazine
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Intellectual Property Magazine
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
Ryan W. Marth
Partner
Related Publications
May 19, 2022
11th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
William Reiss, Dave Rochelson - Law360
May 5, 2022
Antitrust Law As A Tool Against Privacy Abuses
Law 360 - William Reiss and Matthew Geyer
October 25, 2021
Summary of the Trial Decision in Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Geoffrey H. Kozen
September 28, 2021
Briefly: Federal appeals: How much notice is enough?
Stephen Safranski and Geoffrey Kozen - Minnesota Lawyer
Summer 2021
IATL President's Letter on Judicial Security
Roman Silberfeld - The Robins Kaplan Quarterly: Tackling Tough Business Litigation Matters
Related News
September 12, 2022
July 28, 2022
July 14, 2022
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.