- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP™
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLPTM
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
October 21, 2021Oren Langer Named New York Managing Partner
-
October 19, 2021Three Robins Kaplan Partners Selected to Receive 2021 Minnesota Icon Award
-
October 18, 2021Women's Leadership Award Created in Memory of Hollis Salzman
-
October 25, 2021Women’s Bar Association of Massachusetts (WBA) 2021 Gala
-
October 28, 2021From Riches to Rags, a Story of a Damaged Nonprofit
-
October 29, 2021Eighth Circuit Judicial Conference
-
Fall 2021Are All Fiduciaries Created Equal?
-
Fall 2021Context Matters: Fiduciaries and the Rule Against Self-Dealing
-
Fall 2021Update on DOL Fiduciary Rule
-
October 20, 2021Financial Daily Dose 10.20.2021 | Top Story: Credit Suisse Fined $475M Over Mozambique Bribery Scandal
-
October 20, 2021The Robins Kaplan Privacy Pulse | Ransomware Attack Targets Sinclair Broadcast Group
-
October 19, 2021Financial Daily Dose 10.19.2021 | Top Story: SEC Issues Long-Awaited Report on Meme Stock Craze
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
No Heightened Pleading Standard for Antitrust Plaintiffs
After Twombly, lower court cases like Evergreen Partnering Group clarify antitrust has no probability or other heightened pleading standard.
August 16, 2013
Law360, New York (August 16, 2013, 11:57 AM ET) ‐‐ In Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly, the U.S. Supreme Court held that factual allegations in a complaint must suggest that the plaintiff has a plausible — as opposed to merely a conceivable — claim for relief. The court also cautioned that requiring plausible grounds to infer an antitrust agreement does not impose a probability requirement at the pleading stage.
© All Content Copyright 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc. Posted with permission.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Law360
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Publications
July 6, 2021
'Abuse of dominance': Was this what Congress originally intended for Section 2?
Eamon O'Kelly, Vidya Dindiyal - Westlaw Today
Spring 2021
April 13, 2021
US Antitrust Regulators Should Foster Climate Collaboration
Ben Steinberg, Adam Mendel - Law360
October 22, 2020
No-Poach Antitrust Standard Unclear In Franchising
William Reiss, Matthew Geyer - Law360
Summer 2020
A Perfect Storm: Health Care Consolidation and the Lack of Antitrust Enforcement
Kellie Lerner, Matthew Geyer - Antitrust, Vol. 34, No. 3, American Bar Association
Related News
August 23, 2021
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.