Split On Calif. Code Upgrade Coverage Remains Unresolved

An appellate court recently interpreted the law and ordinance exclusion to preclude coverage when the enforcement of a law or ordinance is the actual cause of the loss itself rather than a covered peril.

March 18, 2013

Law360, New York (March 18, 2013, 1:17 PM EDT) -- California’s Fourth Appellate District Court recently interpreted the law and ordinance exclusion to preclude coverage when the enforcement of a law or ordinance is the actual cause of the loss itself rather than a covered peril. Reichert v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., 212 Cal. App. 4th 1543, 152 Cal. Rptr. 3d 6 (2012). Additionally, the court held that even if the law or ordinance is being enforced due to a third party’s negligence, the loss may still be precluded under the exclusion. Id. at 1549-50, 152 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 10-11.

All Content © 2003-2017, Portfolio Media, Inc.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Related Publications

June 7, 2022
Damned if You Do,
Damned if You Don’t
Taylore Karpa Schollard - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
Take-Home COVID: The New Frontier?
Erica Ramsey - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
What’s in a Name?
Michele N. Detherage, Esq. - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
Women Leaders Excel
In Times of Crisis:
Melissa D'Alelio - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
April 14, 2022
'Take-Home' COVID And Emerging Liability Insurance Issues
Melissa D'Alelio, Michael Collier - Law360
Back to Top