- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
- Litigation Support Services
-
January 17, 2020Patrick Arenz Named to America's Top 100 List for High-Stakes Litigation
-
January 08, 2020Bremer Bank Employee-Shareholders File Class Action Lawsuit Against Three Trustees of Otto Bremer Trust
-
January 08, 2020Robins Kaplan Adds Leading Civil Rights, Personal Injury Attorneys to Minneapolis Office
-
January 20, 2020The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers 2020 Awards Ceremony
-
January 24, 2020Elimination of Bias: Seeing Juveniles with Justice
-
January 28, 2020Boston 1L Diversity Summer Associate Program Reception
-
January 10, 2020Top Tips for Trying Your First (or Next) Patent Jury Trial
-
January 2020A Victory for All Involved
-
January 2020Facing the Music: Protecting Photography in the Age of Instagram
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
2011: A Case Odyssey - Part 1
As a result of these and other decisions, all reasonable royalty claims are now examined through a microscope instead of a telescope.
March 23, 2012
Law360, New York (March 23, 2012, 12:42 PM ET) -- On Jan. 4, 2011, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Uniloc,[1] famously delivering a fatal blow to the availability of the 25 percent rule of thumb in calculating patent damages. Uniloc followed on the heels of several other important decisions, namely Lucent (September 2009),[2] ResQNet.com (February 2010)[3] and Wordtech (June 2010),[4] during a time when Congress was evaluating a draft patent reform bill containing significant guidance on how trial courts should treat damages claims and evidence thereof.
All Content © 2003-2011, Portfolio Media, Inc.The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
Law360
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
William H. Manning
Partner
Aaron R. Fahrenkrog
Partner
Related Publications
January 10, 2020
September 22, 2019
Weaponizing IPRs
Landslide
August 29, 2019
Resolving Patent Disputes
Financier Worldwide
July 1, 2019
May 20, 2019
Adapt Your IP Strategy for Artificial Intelligence
Robins Kaplan LLP
Related News
September 16, 2019
July 26, 2019
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.