Debate Continues Over Paid in Full Patent Awards
December 12, 2011
The evolving damages issues in patent cases continue to challenge courts and counsel. Perhaps the most unsettled of these issues pertains to damages for future infringement. Now that injunctions are no longer routinely granted, courts wrestle with how to compensate a patent holder for its right to exclude when the remedy of exclusion is unavailable. In light of Lucent Techs. Inc. v. Gateway Inc., 580 F.3d 1301, 1324-26 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (en banc), defendants increasingly have argued for a new form of damages—the paid-in-full, lump-sum award—that ostensibly moots issues over future infringement. Although some district courts have approved of this approach, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has not specifically addressed this issue. But as set forth below, it likely is only a matter of time before the court does.
Reprinted with permission from the December 12, 2011 edition of THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL © 2010 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.