Antitrust A brighter future for private plaintiff challenges
November 28, 2011
Traditionally, private plaintiffs have not fared as well as the government in merger challenges. Indeed, the standards for establishing private standing and entitlement to injunctive relief under § 16 of the Clayton Act relegate many onetime private antitrust plaintiffs to explanatory footnotes in district court opinions granting motions to dismiss new private antitrust lawsuits. A recent opinion in the challenge by two competitor-plaintiffs to AT&T Inc.'s proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA Inc. highlights the unique challenges private antitrust litigants face when seeking to enjoin competitor mergers. This article provides an overview of those challenges and suggests how recent developments in public antitrust law might affect the case and future private merger challenges.
Reprinted with permission from the November 28, 2011 edition of THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL © 2011 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.