- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
October 22, 2020Scott Gautier Elected to 2021 TMA Executive Board
-
October 21, 2020Dr. Shelley Gilliss Named to the 2020 Minnesota 500
-
October 20, 2020Boston Attorneys Recognized as 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
-
October 27, 2020Use of Deadly Force by Law Enforcement
-
October 28, 2020Bold Engineering: Innovations in Law Firm Pricing Models
-
October 22-30, 20202020 American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Virtual Annual Meeting
-
October 22, 2020No-Poach Antitrust Standard Unclear In Franchising
-
Fall 2020From the Trenches: A Spotlight Interview with Larry Farese
-
October 21, 2020How a Big Law Firm Is Tackling Real Estate Realities in a Pandemic
DOJ s Conduct Remedies Lessons From North Of The Border
September 19, 2011
Law360, New York (September 19, 2011) -- In June 2011, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice issued an updated "Policy Guide to Merger Remedies" for the first time in seven years. These new guidelines reflect a significant new commitment by the DOJ to pursue formerly disfavored conduct remedies such as firewall, nondiscrimination, mandatory licensing, transparency, anti-retaliation and other commercial-behavior-controlling means of addressing competition concerns.
All Content © 2003-2011, Portfolio Media, Inc. Reprinted with permission.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Lauren Schrero
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.