The Expert Disclosure Pitfalls of Rule 26(a)(2)
May 27, 2011
Law360, New York (May 27, 2011) -- Highly compensated, professional "experts" are a fixture of modern-day patent cases. The central role these experts play in modern-day patent cases can lead to the impression that the expert-disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) apply only to them - witnesses who will opine on ultimate issues such as infringement, invalidity and damages.
Do you need to disclose your witness as an 'expert'? The answer lies not in who the witness is, but in what the witness's testimony will be.
© All Content Copyright 2003-2011, Portfolio Media, Inc. Posted with permission.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.