'American Needle’ Has Repercussions Beyond Sports
Ruling supports suits against some joint ventures in real estate, health care and other industries.
November 1, 2010
Reprinted with permission from the November 1, 2010 edition of THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL © 2010 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.
In American Needle Inc. v. National Football League, 130 S. Ct. 2201 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that collective licensing of the 32 National Football League teams' intellectual property constituted an "agreement" among competitors under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1. The Court's decision will extend well beyond the arena of professional sports, however, to preserve or strengthen antitrust enforcement in several critical sectors of the U.S. economy. In particular, the Court's decision supports government and private suits against real estate multiple-listing services, physician joint ventures and payment-card networks, and perhaps joint ventures in other industries as well.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.