- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
July 31, 2020Patrick Arenz and Aaron Fahrenkrog named to Benchmark Litigation 40 & Under Hot List
-
July 27, 2020Christine Yun Sauer Shortlisted for Chambers Diversity and Inclusion Awards
-
July 23, 2020Kate Jaycox Recognized for Service to American Association for Justice
-
August 7-12, 2020Minnesota CLE The Law of the Smart Phone Webcast Series
-
August 14, 2020Notable Recent & Pending Class Action Cases in the 9th Circuit and SCOTUS
-
August 18, 2020Discovering a Hidden Revenue Stream: Recoveries from Antitrust Class Action Settlements in Economic Downturn
-
July 2020Hatch-Waxman Patent Litigation Strategies
-
July 22, 2020Injectafer Linked to Severe Hypophosphatemia
-
July 20, 2020Deadlines or Guidelines?
Insurance Companies On Offense
April 21, 2009
Published on Financial Services Law360 and Securities Law360 and Insurance Law360 by Portfolio Media on April 21, 2009
In the wake of the current financial crisis, large multiline insurance companies find themselves defending the Directors and Officers (“D&O”) and Errors and Omissions (“E&O”) policies issued to financial companies and the individual directors and officers.
Investors are also bringing securities class actions and other suits against certain insurance companies, particularly the monoline companies, claiming misrepresentation of purported risk exposure and inadequate internal underwriting and ratings systems for various classes of asset-backed securities....
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Christopher P. Sullivan
Partner
Stacey Slaughter
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.