- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Childhood Sexual Abuse Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Restructuring and Business Bankruptcy
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
February 24, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP Partners with University of South Dakota for Annual Moot Court Competition
-
February 20, 2020Robins Kaplan LLP and Partner Hollis Salzman Named Finalists for Global Competition Review’s 2020 Antitrust Awards
-
February 14, 2020Robins Kaplan Recognized in 2020 World Trademark Review 1000
-
March 2, 2020Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
-
March 4, 2020The Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles 25th Annual Litigators Forum
-
March 4, 2020Women in Legal and Corporate Leadership Summit
-
February 11, 2020INSIGHT: California’s Rebuke of Forced Arbitration in Limbo, Full of Uncertainty
-
February 7, 2020Colossus and Xactimate: A Tale of Two AI Insurance Software Programs
-
February 2020Have You Seen My Genes? Preconception Carrier Screening
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Maximizing Your Patent Strategy In A Changing World
January 3, 2009
Patent Exhaustion
While this year was not as dramatic as 2007, we still had some significant developments in the patent arena. Certainly one of the most anticipated cases was the United States Supreme Court's decision in Quanta Computer Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc., 128 S. Ct. 2109; 170 L. Ed. 2d 996 (U.S. 2008), with its impact on the patent exhaustion doctrine. For matters decided so far in 2008, this case has the most potential to affect the area of patent law-specifically strategies of licensing versus enforcement.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.
Patent Law 2009: Top Lawyers on Trends and Key Strategies for the Upcoming Year, Aspatore Special Report
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Professionals
David W. Beehler
Of Counsel
Related Publications
January 10, 2020
September 22, 2019
Weaponizing IPRs
Landslide
August 29, 2019
Resolving Patent Disputes
Financier Worldwide
July 1, 2019
May 20, 2019
Adapt Your IP Strategy for Artificial Intelligence
Robins Kaplan LLP
Related News
September 16, 2019
July 26, 2019
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.