- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
May 26, 2022Shira Shapiro Named Woman of Promise By The Pearl Society
-
May 12, 2022Robins Kaplan Practice Group, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
-
May 9, 2022Six Partners Recognized as “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property
-
June 2, 2022Hennepin County Bar Foundation 2022 Bar Benefit
-
June 2, 2022Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers 2022 Stepping Up Breakfast
-
June 2, 2022YWCA Minneapolis Empower Possible
-
May 24, 2022Briefly: Seeking Fees and Costs While on Appeal
-
May 19, 202211th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
-
May 13, 2022Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-
May 27, 2022Unexpectedly Strong Retail Sales Pull Markets Back from the Brink
-
May 26, 2022Fed Minutes Show Inflation-Fighting Commitment, Spur Market Rally
-
May 25, 2022Mining Giant Glencore Fined $1.1B Over Global Bribery and Price Manipulation Scheme
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Robins Kaplan Receives High Rankings by Benchmark Litigation 2022
October 6, 2021
Benchmark Litigation has recognized Robins Kaplan LLP as a recommended litigation firm in Minnesota and New York, as well as a nationally recommended firm for antitrust, commercial litigation, and intellectual property.
Additionally, the 2022 guide has named 15 partners as “Litigation Stars” or “Future Stars,” including list newcomers Jason Pfeiffer and Meegan Hollywood.
Nationwide Rankings
Antitrust Litigation - Tier 1
General Commercial - Tier 2
Intellectual Property - Tier 2
Regional Rankings
Minnesota- Highly Recommended
New York - Recommended
Individual Recognition
- Patrick Arenz - Minnesota Future Star
- Elizabeth Gardner - New York Litigation Star
- Jake Holdreith - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Meegan Hollywood – New York Future Star
- Christopher Larus - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Kellie Lerner - New York Litigation Star
- Anne Lockner - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Chris Messerly - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Cyrus Morton - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Jason Pfeiffer – Minnesota Litigation Star
- Ronald Schutz - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Roman Silberfeld - California Litigation Star
- Stacey Slaughter - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Thomas Undlin - Minnesota Litigation Star
- Craig Wildfang - Minnesota Litigation Star
Related Publications
May 24, 2022
Briefly: Seeking Fees and Costs While on Appeal
Eric Magnuson, Gregory Voshell - Minnesota Lawyer
May 19, 2022
11th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
William Reiss, Dave Rochelson - Law360
May 13, 2022
Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
David Martinez, Zac Cohen - Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal
May 5, 2022
Antitrust Law As A Tool Against Privacy Abuses
Law 360 - William Reiss and Matthew Geyer
First Quarter
ANDA Litigation Settlements
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
Related News
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.