- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 30, 2023Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Robins Kaplan Partner Tara Sutton Give Opening Statements in Minnesota’s Lawsuit Against JUUL
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
April 19, 2023FBA Women in MDL, Mass and Class Leadership
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
March 2023How an Investor Can Lose More Than Just Their Investment
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP Files Lawsuit Alleging Major Rail Equipment Suppliers Entered into Unlawful No-Poach Agreements
April 30, 2018
New York, NY—April 30, 2018—National trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® has filed a proposed class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania alleging three of the world’s largest rail equipment suppliers entered into unlawful no-poach agreements to restrain competition in the labor market in which they compete for employees. The complaint alleges Knorr-Bremse AG (Knorr), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec), and Faiveley Transport S.A. (Faiveley) violated the Sherman Act by agreeing to not solicit, recruit, or hire each other’s employees.
According to the complaint, beginning as early as 2009, defendants agreed to not recruit or hire each other’s workers without prior approval. These agreements substantially limited rail industry workers’ access to better opportunities and deprived them of information they could have used in negotiating better terms of employment, including higher compensation.
Robins Kaplan filed the complaint on behalf of a former employee of a Faiveley entity and all persons employed by the defendants from 2009 to the present.
On April 3, 2018, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it had reached a settlement with Knorr and Wabtec, charging them with unlawfully entering into no-poach agreements to restrain competition in the labor market. The DOJ originally uncovered these agreements while investigating the proposed merger of Faiveley and Wabtec.
Robins Kaplan partners Hollis Salzman, Kellie Lerner, and Thomas Undlin, as well as counsel Tai Milder and Aaron Sheanin, are representing the proposed class.
The case is Dustin Theobald v. Knorr-Bremse Ag; Knorr Brake Company; New York Air Brake Company; Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation; and Faiveley Transport North America Inc., No. 18-cv-00526 (W.D. Pa).
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.