- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
June 23, 2022Robins Kaplan’s Antitrust Class Action Practice Recognized as Leader In The Field For Fourth Consecutive Year
-
June 17, 2022Robins Kaplan Secures Complete Dismissal of $160 Million Copyright and Software License Dispute
-
June 13, 2022Robins Kaplan Wins Judgment Vacating Two Confessions of Judgment Totaling Nearly $20 Million
-
July 25, 2022Tee It Up for the Troops
-
September 22, 202220th Annual Golf Tournament
-
June 21, 2022How To Oppose An Extension If You Really Need To
-
June 7, 2022Damned if You Do,
Damned if You Don’t -
June 7, 2022Take-Home COVID: The New Frontier?
-
June 24, 2022Biggest US Banks Sail Through Latest Round of Fed Stress Testing
-
June 23, 2022Powell Admits Recession Possible, Sees Tricky Path to Soft Landing
-
June 22, 2022Meta Reaches Settlement With Feds Over Allegedly Discriminatory Housing Ads
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP Files Lawsuit Alleging Major Rail Equipment Suppliers Entered into Unlawful No-Poach Agreements
April 30, 2018
New York, NY—April 30, 2018—National trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® has filed a proposed class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania alleging three of the world’s largest rail equipment suppliers entered into unlawful no-poach agreements to restrain competition in the labor market in which they compete for employees. The complaint alleges Knorr-Bremse AG (Knorr), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec), and Faiveley Transport S.A. (Faiveley) violated the Sherman Act by agreeing to not solicit, recruit, or hire each other’s employees.
According to the complaint, beginning as early as 2009, defendants agreed to not recruit or hire each other’s workers without prior approval. These agreements substantially limited rail industry workers’ access to better opportunities and deprived them of information they could have used in negotiating better terms of employment, including higher compensation.
Robins Kaplan filed the complaint on behalf of a former employee of a Faiveley entity and all persons employed by the defendants from 2009 to the present.
On April 3, 2018, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it had reached a settlement with Knorr and Wabtec, charging them with unlawfully entering into no-poach agreements to restrain competition in the labor market. The DOJ originally uncovered these agreements while investigating the proposed merger of Faiveley and Wabtec.
Robins Kaplan partners Hollis Salzman, Kellie Lerner, and Thomas Undlin, as well as counsel Tai Milder and Aaron Sheanin, are representing the proposed class.
The case is Dustin Theobald v. Knorr-Bremse Ag; Knorr Brake Company; New York Air Brake Company; Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation; and Faiveley Transport North America Inc., No. 18-cv-00526 (W.D. Pa).
Related Professionals
Thomas J. Undlin
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.